On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 07:00:32AM -0400, Chuck wrote:
On Friday 21 October 2005 12:23 pm, Chuck wrote:
On Friday 21 October 2005 12:12 pm, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 06:58:38AM -0400, Chuck wrote:
i forget.. was it ngnet that would support a few hundred ip addys in a
On Monday 10 April 2006 02:10 pm, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
whoah... heh ok maybe i will implement 'plan B' for now and wait until this is
all settled in. those figures are a bit too much for us to use presently.
On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 07:00:32AM -0400, Chuck wrote:
On Friday 21 October 2005
On Friday 21 October 2005 12:23 pm, Chuck wrote:
On Friday 21 October 2005 12:12 pm, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 06:58:38AM -0400, Chuck wrote:
i forget.. was it ngnet that would support a few hundred ip addys in a
guest?
i have a few big machines i cant move over
On Fri, 2005-10-21 at 15:40 -0400, Chuck wrote:
so then just for clarity, using the current vserver software
(2.1.0-r4) with up to 16 ip addys does not give any performance hits
at all compared to 1 but beyond that is when it gets nasty.
no, that is a linear search, so every new ip
On Mon, 2005-10-24 at 19:29 -0400, Chuck wrote:
ok.. so how may ips in a guest do you estimate could be used before a
perceptable change in performance happens? and by this are we talking
about
per interface or gross totals among all interfaces?
That really is a hard question to
i forget.. was it ngnet that would support a few hundred ip addys in a guest?
i have a few big machines i cant move over until it can efficiently support
several hundred ip addys (minimum a /24) ... if ngnet is the answer im gonna
try to raise some funding from my boss .. no promises as he does
On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 06:58:38AM -0400, Chuck wrote:
i forget.. was it ngnet that would support a few hundred ip addys in a
guest?
i have a few big machines i cant move over until it can efficiently
support several hundred ip addys (minimum a /24) ... if ngnet is the
answer im gonna try to
On Friday 21 October 2005 12:12 pm, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 06:58:38AM -0400, Chuck wrote:
i forget.. was it ngnet that would support a few hundred ip addys in a
guest?
i have a few big machines i cant move over until it can efficiently
support several hundred ip
On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 12:23:38PM -0400, Chuck wrote:
On Friday 21 October 2005 12:12 pm, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 06:58:38AM -0400, Chuck wrote:
i forget.. was it ngnet that would support a few hundred ip addys in a
guest?
i have a few big machines i cant move
On Friday 21 October 2005 12:39 pm, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 12:23:38PM -0400, Chuck wrote:
On Friday 21 October 2005 12:12 pm, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 06:58:38AM -0400, Chuck wrote:
snip
so then just for clarity, using the current vserver
10 matches
Mail list logo
