Re: AW: AW: [Vserver] kernel-2.6.17.13
On Sun November 26 2006 10:20, Roman Pretory wrote:
>
>
> Find where your host distribution keeps its udev rules,
> rename your nics using their hardware (mac) address, like:
>
> [Debian/Etch location but rule content should be the same]
> in: /etc/udev/rules.d/z25_persistent-net.rules:
>
> # You can modify these, as long as you keep each rule on a single line.
>
> SUBSYSTEM=="net", DRIVERS=="?*", ATTRS{address}=="00:00:e8:60:ba:8a",
> NAME="eth0"
>
> SUBSYSTEM=="net", DRIVERS=="?*", ATTRS{address}=="00:01:29:24:75:e9",
> NAME="eth1"
>
> # USB device 0bda:8150 (rtl8150)
> SUBSYSTEM=="net", DRIVERS=="?*", ATTRS{address}=="00:e0:4c:03:50:1d",
> NAME="eth2"
>
> Mike
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Usb not used and removed all modules
>
My PCI nics are not hot-swappable, the USB nic is - that entry just
shows that things work as expected as I move the nic around the USB tree.
> to bind ore fix nic/mag/driver makes troubles by cloning or changing nic :-(
>
True - but naming by hardware address is not the only choice.
See: man udevinfo and the option: --attribute-walk
> only useable diver module select and there to much :-)
You can specify the driver module to be used (untested here).
> could brake remote access so have to find differt way
> but good to know keep it in mind
>
And if all the built-in features fail your needs, a rule
can run an external script (untested here).
>
>
> but by the way why a stable patch for a developer(unstable)Kernel(17)??
> ore are by information about not up to date?
>
I do not have a clue to that answer.
The files on kernel.org show that 2.6.16 and 2.6.18 are being maintained
more recently than 2.6.17 - I do not know why that is.
> BRG
> Roman
>
Mike
___
Vserver mailing list
Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
AW: AW: [Vserver] kernel-2.6.17.13
Daniel, the Kernel source is still installed on this node i only have to make module_install & install reboot if you give things to test or to look at i could do it BRG Roman > RP> .)Mailserver can't send mails with the new kernel > >>> Again - what do you mean by that, what was expected and what did you >>> get? > >>> A bit on information is necessary - a bit more always welcom. You >>> should > know that from your first "request session" > > mailserver fc3 trys to send mails and can't > take wron ip ,can't find host... > in bash all ok dns give correct answers > =>look for log > =>reboot sendmail > =>reboot guest > =>reboot node > =>reboot node with 2.6.12.3 == mail are send! > =>reboot node with 2.6.17 == error again > =>reboot node with 2.6.12.3 == mail are send! And why can't you send mail with 2.6.17? What does "take wrong IP" mean? yes this was confusing sendmail said to contact my mailserver by host mail.xy.at at xy.xy.xy.8 this a record don't exist on this ip it have xy.xy.xy.2 it was a used a time ago for a subdomain for testing, but exist not anymore in the bash by ping i get the correct a & mx record I can't test more because it was my intern mailserver. file, web, dns guests seems to work! i'm upgrading all nodes in the moment und a kernel update looks to be wise.. bevor so it' have to run with the old kernel until all is fixed. I was only confused because I canged the kernel now for many times, by the same prozedure without troubles. So this time i was careless making a quicker install. Thanks for Info/Help analysis/testing need now time and so a new Thread BRG Roman PS: Nice new Wiki if the DNS are up :-) Thanks to Owner/Admin -- Daniel Hokka Zakrisson GPG id: 06723412 GPG fingerprint: A455 4DF3 990A 431F FECA 7947 6136 DDA2 0672 3412 ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
AW: AW: [Vserver] kernel-2.6.17.13
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Michael S.
Zick
Gesendet: Sonntag, 26. November 2006 16:11
An: vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
Betreff: Re: AW: [Vserver] kernel-2.6.17.13
On Sun November 26 2006 08:54, Daniel Hokka Zakrisson wrote:
> Roman Pretory wrote:
> > RP> ist a horror
> > RP> .)modules for iptables have canged
> > RP> have to search after use oldconfig
> >
> >>> What is the old version you compared it against?
> >
> > old Kernel = 2.6.12.3 = old .config
>
> Of course, things change, that is to be expected. Netfilter got a
> rewrite a couple of versions ago (2.6.16, I think).
>
The udev event system also changed across 2.6.14/.15
> > RP> .)Nic's are turned very funny for remote work
> >
Find where your host distribution keeps its udev rules,
rename your nics using their hardware (mac) address, like:
[Debian/Etch location but rule content should be the same]
in: /etc/udev/rules.d/z25_persistent-net.rules:
# You can modify these, as long as you keep each rule on a single line.
SUBSYSTEM=="net", DRIVERS=="?*", ATTRS{address}=="00:00:e8:60:ba:8a",
NAME="eth0"
SUBSYSTEM=="net", DRIVERS=="?*", ATTRS{address}=="00:01:29:24:75:e9",
NAME="eth1"
# USB device 0bda:8150 (rtl8150)
SUBSYSTEM=="net", DRIVERS=="?*", ATTRS{address}=="00:e0:4c:03:50:1d",
NAME="eth2"
Mike
Thanks
Usb not used and removed all modules
to bind ore fix nic/mag/driver makes troubles by cloning or changing nic :-(
only useable diver module select and there to much :-)
could brake remote access so have to find differt way
but good to know keep it in mind
but by the way why a stable patch for a developer(unstable)Kernel(17)??
ore are by information about not up to date?
BRG
Roman
___
Vserver mailing list
Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
___
Vserver mailing list
Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
AW: AW: [Vserver] kernel-2.6.17.13
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Daniel Hokka Zakrisson Gesendet: Sonntag, 26. November 2006 15:54 An: vserver@list.linux-vserver.org Betreff: Re: AW: [Vserver] kernel-2.6.17.13 Roman Pretory wrote: > RP> ist a horror > RP> .)modules for iptables have canged > RP> have to search after use oldconfig > >>> What is the old version you compared it against? > > old Kernel = 2.6.12.3 = old .config Of course, things change, that is to be expected. Netfilter got a rewrite a couple of versions ago (2.6.16, I think). I already found such changes now by 2.14 will see > RP> .)Nic's are turned very funny for remote work > >>> What do you mean by that, what was expected and what did you get? > > 2 nic's in each server > Production1: 2x 3 Com90xx == not testet > Production2: Intel / Realtech == error > Testsystem: 2x 3 Com90xx == error > > after reboot with the new kernel > eth0 = eth1 > eth1 = eth0 You shouldn't rely on the kernel's naming. If you need eth0 to refer to a specific interface, you'll have to tell your distribution's network scripts to rename the interface with that hardware address. Thanks since now never used to could surly making troubless by canging nics > RP> .)Mailserver can't send mails with the new kernel > >>> Again - what do you mean by that, what was expected and what did you >>> get? > >>> A bit on information is necessary - a bit more always welcom. You >>> should > know that from your first "request session" > > mailserver fc3 trys to send mails and can't > take wron ip ,can't find host... > in bash all ok dns give correct answers > =>look for log > =>reboot sendmail > =>reboot guest > =>reboot node > =>reboot node with 2.6.12.3 == mail are send! > =>reboot node with 2.6.17 == error again > =>reboot node with 2.6.12.3 == mail are send! And why can't you send mail with 2.6.17? What does "take wrong IP" mean? yes this was confusing sendmail said to contact my mailserver by host mail.xy.at at xy.xy.xy.8 this a record don't exist on this ip it have xy.xy.xy.2 it was a used a time ago for a subdomain for testing, but exist not anymore in the bash by ping i get the correct a & mx record I can't test more because it was my intern mailserver. file, web, dns guests seems to work! i'm upgrading all nodes in the moment und a kernel update looks to be wise.. bevor so it' have to run with the old kernel until all is fixed. I was only confused because I canged the kernel now for many times, by the same prozedure without troubles. So this time i was careless making a quicker install. Thanks for Info/Help analysis/testing need now time and so a new Thread BRG Roman PS: Nice new Wiki if the DNS are up :-) Thanks to Owner/Admin -- Daniel Hokka Zakrisson GPG id: 06723412 GPG fingerprint: A455 4DF3 990A 431F FECA 7947 6136 DDA2 0672 3412 ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Re: AW: [Vserver] kernel-2.6.17.13
On Sun November 26 2006 08:54, Daniel Hokka Zakrisson wrote:
> Roman Pretory wrote:
> > RP> ist a horror
> > RP> .)modules for iptables have canged
> > RP> have to search after use oldconfig
> >
> >>> What is the old version you compared it against?
> >
> > old Kernel = 2.6.12.3 = old .config
>
> Of course, things change, that is to be expected. Netfilter got a
> rewrite a couple of versions ago (2.6.16, I think).
>
The udev event system also changed across 2.6.14/.15
> > RP> .)Nic's are turned very funny for remote work
> >
Find where your host distribution keeps its udev rules,
rename your nics using their hardware (mac) address, like:
[Debian/Etch location but rule content should be the same]
in: /etc/udev/rules.d/z25_persistent-net.rules:
# You can modify these, as long as you keep each rule on a single line.
SUBSYSTEM=="net", DRIVERS=="?*", ATTRS{address}=="00:00:e8:60:ba:8a",
NAME="eth0"
SUBSYSTEM=="net", DRIVERS=="?*", ATTRS{address}=="00:01:29:24:75:e9",
NAME="eth1"
# USB device 0bda:8150 (rtl8150)
SUBSYSTEM=="net", DRIVERS=="?*", ATTRS{address}=="00:e0:4c:03:50:1d",
NAME="eth2"
Mike
___
Vserver mailing list
Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Re: AW: [Vserver] kernel-2.6.17.13
Roman Pretory wrote: RP> ist a horror RP> .)modules for iptables have canged RP> have to search after use oldconfig What is the old version you compared it against? old Kernel = 2.6.12.3 = old .config Of course, things change, that is to be expected. Netfilter got a rewrite a couple of versions ago (2.6.16, I think). RP> .)Nic's are turned very funny for remote work What do you mean by that, what was expected and what did you get? 2 nic's in each server Production1: 2x 3 Com90xx == not testet Production2: Intel / Realtech == error Testsystem: 2x 3 Com90xx == error after reboot with the new kernel eth0 = eth1 eth1 = eth0 You shouldn't rely on the kernel's naming. If you need eth0 to refer to a specific interface, you'll have to tell your distribution's network scripts to rename the interface with that hardware address. RP> .)Mailserver can't send mails with the new kernel Again - what do you mean by that, what was expected and what did you get? A bit on information is necessary - a bit more always welcom. You should know that from your first "request session" mailserver fc3 trys to send mails and can't take wron ip ,can't find host... in bash all ok dns give correct answers =>look for log =>reboot sendmail =>reboot guest =>reboot node =>reboot node with 2.6.12.3 == mail are send! =>reboot node with 2.6.17 == error again =>reboot node with 2.6.12.3 == mail are send! And why can't you send mail with 2.6.17? What does "take wrong IP" mean? -- Daniel Hokka Zakrisson GPG id: 06723412 GPG fingerprint: A455 4DF3 990A 431F FECA 7947 6136 DDA2 0672 3412 ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
AW: [Vserver] kernel-2.6.17.13
update see below! -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Guenther Fuchs Gesendet: Sonntag, 26. November 2006 14:29 An: vserver@list.linux-vserver.org Betreff: Re: [Vserver] kernel-2.6.17.13 Hi there, on Sunday, November 26, 2006 at 12:54:08 PM there was posted: RP> just testet kernel-2.6.17.13 / patch-2.6.17.13-vs2.0.2.1.diff.bz2 RP> for 2 dayes >>On which distribution platfom? Node = FC3 cpu=AMD atlon GHZ=1.7- 2.1 Ram=512-2GB MB=A7V old Kernel = 2.6.12.3 util-vserver = 0.30.211 Guest= RH9,FC1-3, Centos4x RP> ist a horror RP> .)modules for iptables have canged RP> have to search after use oldconfig >>What is the old version you compared it against? old Kernel = 2.6.12.3 = old .config RP> .)Nic's are turned very funny for remote work >>What do you mean by that, what was expected and what did you get? 2 nic's in each server Production1: 2x 3 Com90xx == not testet Production2: Intel / Realtech == error Testsystem: 2x 3 Com90xx == error after reboot with the new kernel eth0 = eth1 eth1 = eth0 RP> .)Mailserver can't send mails with the new kernel >>Again - what do you mean by that, what was expected and what did you get? >>A bit on information is necessary - a bit more always welcom. You should know that from your first "request session" mailserver fc3 trys to send mails and can't take wron ip ,can't find host... in bash all ok dns give correct answers =>look for log =>reboot sendmail =>reboot guest =>reboot node =>reboot node with 2.6.12.3 == mail are send! =>reboot node with 2.6.17 == error again =>reboot node with 2.6.12.3 == mail are send! last .conf could be send if there is a need of BRG Roman -- regards 'n greez, Guenther Fuchs (aka "muh" and "powerfox") ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
