Andres,
07.03.2014 19:15, Andres Riancho пишет:
> Don't want to re-open this, but just a FYI:
>
> https://github.com/axiak/pybloomfiltermmap/issues/29
>
> In other words, 0.3.11 of pybloomfiltermmap installation works
> flawlessly, while 0.3.12 fails with gcc compilation errors :( If we
> would ha
Don't want to re-open this, but just a FYI:
https://github.com/axiak/pybloomfiltermmap/issues/29
In other words, 0.3.11 of pybloomfiltermmap installation works
flawlessly, while 0.3.12 fails with gcc compilation errors :( If we
would have had >= this would have been an issue for us too.
On Tue,
Andres,
Ok, I've got your opinion. Let's close this discussion.
17.02.2014 00:04, Andres Riancho пишет:
> Taras,
>
> On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 4:28 PM, Taras wrote:
>> Andres,
>>
>> I think it is my last attempt to change your opinion :)
>>
>> From the list of software you have provided I have fo
Taras,
On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 4:28 PM, Taras wrote:
> Andres,
>
> I think it is my last attempt to change your opinion :)
>
> From the list of software you have provided I have found only flask, scrapy
> and tastypie in Ubuntu repo. Results of "apt-cache show" output are below
> inline.
> The pr
Andres,
I think it is my last attempt to change your opinion :)
From the list of software you have provided I have found only flask,
scrapy and tastypie in Ubuntu repo. Results of "apt-cache show" output
are below inline.
The problem is w3af built-in dependency checker duplicates
OS (e.g. Debi
On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 8:27 AM, Taras wrote:
> Andres,
>
>
>> Not 100% a workaround, this is also a best practice!
>>
>> https://devcenter.heroku.com/articles/python-pip#the-basics
>
>
> Could you please show at least one example of well-know software with such
> requirements?
I went through thi
Andres,
> Not 100% a workaround, this is also a best practice!
>
> https://devcenter.heroku.com/articles/python-pip#the-basics
Could you please show at least one example of well-know software with
such requirements? By the way in w3af dev list I see fresh discussion
about similar problems in Ma
Taras,
On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 5:52 PM, Taras wrote:
> Andres,
>
> may be we will add to CC Luciano (luci...@debian.org) who is maintainer of
> w3af package in Debian?
>
>
* The pdfminer issue occurred because we had this requirement:
pdfminer (no version requirement)
* If we speci
Andres,
may be we will add to CC Luciano (luci...@debian.org) who is maintainer
of w3af package in Debian?
>>> * The pdfminer issue occurred because we had this requirement:
>>> pdfminer (no version requirement)
>>> * If we specify something like: pdfminer>=3, then we're fine until
>>> they rele
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 1:15 PM, Taras wrote:
> Andres,
>
> Sorry for delayed reply.
>
>
>> Not sure if I'm understanding your point.
>>
>> * The pdfminer issue occurred because we had this requirement:
>> pdfminer (no version requirement)
>> * If we specify something like: pdfminer>=3, then we're
Andres,
Sorry for delayed reply.
> Not sure if I'm understanding your point.
>
> * The pdfminer issue occurred because we had this requirement:
> pdfminer (no version requirement)
> * If we specify something like: pdfminer>=3, then we're fine until
> they release version 4 which breaks their API
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 12:46 PM, Taras wrote:
> Andres?
>
> What I'm suggesting is to bring back requirements for **minimal** version of
> 3rd party lib
Not sure if I'm understanding your point.
* The pdfminer issue occurred because we had this requirement:
pdfminer (no version requirement)
* If
Andres?
What I'm suggesting is to bring back requirements for **minimal** version of
3rd party lib
В письме от 1 февраля 2014 14:36:05 пользователь Taras написал:
> Andres,
>
> When I talked about packaging problem I meant problems with supported
> versions of e.g. python libs for current popul
Andres,
When I talked about packaging problem I meant problems with supported versions
of e.g. python libs for current popular distros. Consider we have e.g.
some Debian/Ubuntu distro and want to package/install w3af from official repo.
w3af from feature/package branch requires lxml version exac
Taras,
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 4:08 AM, Taras wrote:
> Andres,
>
> Thanks for description of the reason. There are at least two issues with such
> requirements:
>
> 1. It makes impossible to package&install w3af, e.g. into deb package, doesn't
> it?
That's a good question, I'm not packaging expe
Andres,
Thanks for description of the reason. There are at least two issues with such
requirements:
1. It makes impossible to package&install w3af, e.g. into deb package, doesn't
it?
2. If w3af requires 3rd party A version 1 and another application on the
system also requires 3rd party A but v
Taras,
Added that because it is the best thing to do. Search the mailing
list for the issue we had with pdfminer, what happen there was:
* w3af had a requirement for pdfminer, any version
* w3af worked without issues with version 1 of that library
* The pdfminer develop
I was wrong...I have working **master** branch :(
Andres, why did you add requirement for **exact** match of versions in
'feature/module' branch?
$ grep -B5 'version matches'
w3af/core/controllers/dependency_check/dependency_check.py
for w3af_req in pip_packages:
if USE_PIP_MODULE:
Israel, I have working "feature/module" version of w3af on 13.10
What problems do you have?
В письме от 22 января 2014 21:53:48 пользователь Andres Riancho написал:
> Israel,
>
> Haven't tried with that specific version, but what's wrong with:
>
> git clone g...@github.com:andresriancho/w3af
Israel,
Haven't tried with that specific version, but what's wrong with:
git clone g...@github.com:andresriancho/w3af.git
cd w3af
git checkout feature/module
./w3af_console
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 6:00 PM, Israel Duvdavan
wrote:
>
> Hi, does anyone have a working way to install W3af on 13.1
Hi, does anyone have a working way to install W3af on 13.10?
--
Israel
--
CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enterprise Cloud Services.
Learn Why More Businesses Are Choosing CenturyLink Cloud For
Critical Workloads, Develop
21 matches
Mail list logo
