Taras,
Merged into trunk and removed branch! :) Thank you so much for the
great improvement!
Regards,
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 5:33 AM, Taras wrote:
> Andres,
>
> I have replaced direct setting of _mutant_dc with call of setMutantDc() for
> mutantFileName and mutantUrlParts. Tests are also f
Andres,
I have replaced direct setting of _mutant_dc with call of setMutantDc()
for mutantFileName and mutantUrlParts. Tests are also fixed.
26.12.2011 19:45, Andres Riancho пишет:
> Let me know when that's done so I can merge, we can close the branch and
> start with something else :)
> El dic
Let me know when that's done so I can merge, we can close the branch and
start with something else :)
El dic 26, 2011 11:56 a.m., "Taras" escribió:
> Andres,
>
> On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 7:19 AM, Taras wrote:
>>
>>> Andres,
>>>
>>> currently only this comment is unresolved:
>>>
#APR: I woul
Andres,
> On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 7:19 AM, Taras wrote:
>> Andres,
>>
>> currently only this comment is unresolved:
>>> #APR: I would like to see more doctests that represent the real use
>>> of this class. By that I mean that we should use
>>> setModValue() in the doctest instead of "m._mutant_d
Taras,
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 7:19 AM, Taras wrote:
> Andres,
>
> currently only this comment is unresolved:
>> #APR: I would like to see more doctests that represent the real use
>> of this class. By that I mean that we should use
>> setModValue() in the doctest instead of "m._mutant_dc =
>> di
Andres,
ping :)
> currently only this comment is unresolved:
> > #APR: I would like to see more doctests that represent the real use
> > of this class. By that I mean that we should use
> > setModValue() in the doctest instead of "m._mutant_dc =
> > divided_path". The ideal would be t
Andres,
currently only this comment is unresolved:
> #APR: I would like to see more doctests that represent the real use
> of this class. By that I mean that we should use
> setModValue() in the doctest instead of "m._mutant_dc =
> divided_path". The ideal would be to use it just like in fuzze
Andres,
>>> #APR: Do we use this? How?
>>> +def dynamicURL( self ):
>>> +'''
>>> +
>> Strange method and it is only found in base mutant class and mutantFileName.
>> Let's remove it from these places?
>
> Let's remove it! I think we don't use it anywhere!
Fixed!
>>> #APR: Do we want t
Am 23.12.2011 02:16, schrieb Andres Riancho:
> Taras,
>
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 6:07 AM, Taras wrote:
>>> #APR: Do we want to call _createUrlPartsMutants for all freq? Does it make
>>> sense to fuzz the URL when
>>> there are query string parameters? Hmmm... we should think about this.
>>
>>
Taras,
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 6:07 AM, Taras wrote:
> Andres,
>
>
>> I was reading through the whole rewritten-urls branch patch before
>> I merged into the trunk and realized that there are still a couple of
>> pending things and questions and we need to think about. Please read
>> the line
Andres,
> I was reading through the whole rewritten-urls branch patch before
> I merged into the trunk and realized that there are still a couple of
> pending things and questions and we need to think about. Please read
> the lines that start with "#APR" in the attached patch file. Thanks
> a
11 matches
Mail list logo
