Am Montag, 24. August 2009 02:55:14 schrieb Stephen Swaney:
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 12:40:56AM +0200, Christian Ohm wrote:
On Sunday, 23 August 2009 at 23:40, Per Inge Mathisen wrote:
I like current format. It gives superb traceability of everything in
the changelog, and looks really
Am Montag, 24. August 2009 00:40:56 schrieb Christian Ohm:
I agree with Dennis that the Changelog should give a good overview of the
user-relevant changes, and the current copy the svn log the day before a
release approach doesn't do a good job of that. Perhaps we could make it a
policy to
Am Sonntag, 23. August 2009 21:23:25 schrieb bugs buggy:
It is apparent that the current way we do Changelogs isn't the best
way, since it is way more time consuming than it should be.
It should present the user a good overview about new features, which existing
things important to him have
I like current format. It gives superb traceability of everything in
the changelog, and looks really correct. If it is a PITA to maintain
for people, I am willing to do it. If you want to use the ChangeLog in
official postings, just sed remove everything inside parentheses first
to make it look
On Sunday, 23 August 2009 at 23:40, Per Inge Mathisen wrote:
I like current format. It gives superb traceability of everything in
the changelog, and looks really correct. If it is a PITA to maintain
for people, I am willing to do it. If you want to use the ChangeLog in
official postings, just
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 12:40:56AM +0200, Christian Ohm wrote:
On Sunday, 23 August 2009 at 23:40, Per Inge Mathisen wrote:
I like current format. It gives superb traceability of everything in
the changelog, and looks really correct. If it is a PITA to maintain
for people, I am willing
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 5:40 PM, Christian Ohmchr@gmx.net wrote:
I don't mind having the revisions there, but _putting_ them there is a pain
when you don't commit to svn directly.
That's not a big deal. You don't need to edit the changelog when you
commit, you can just read the commit log
