On Thursday, 12 August 2010 at 19:51, Christian Ohm wrote:
Now we just need someone to be your underling, to see how it works (maybe I'll
add another test account for that). I'm not sure how access works, I hope the
coordinator can add people, then review their translations and commit them
Christian Ohm wrote:
Well, it is an experiment currently, to see what it can do. From the looks of
it, we can assign a maintainer to each language, who can then add others to
work together, and commit stuff. So my management overhead decreases
significantly, since I just have to add one person
On Thursday, 12 August 2010 at 19:09, Kreuvf wrote:
So, since you already started that experiment, let's go and see where that
leads
us. First thing: The FAQ misses yet another question (or it's just me not
asking
_frequently_ asked questions): With transifex in place can you still edit po
transi...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
Revision: 11426
http://warzone2100.svn.sourceforge.net/warzone2100/?rev=11426view=rev
Author: transifex
Date: 2010-08-10 20:30:29 + (Tue, 10 Aug 2010)
Log Message:
---
l10n: Updated German (de) translation to 98%
New
On 2010-08-11 20:23, Kreuvf wrote:
Most important question: Why should we trust transifex?
Especially since that site is an interesting target (getting commit access to
whatever number of repositories transifex has access to) for attackers.
sf.net can get hacked to, wz2100.net to but sf.net
On Wednesday, 11 August 2010 at 20:23, Kreuvf wrote:
Who is transifex?
Why does transifex have commit access?
More questions:
Why do we need this?
Because all talk about a private Pootle (or similar) installation fell on deaf
ears.
Hasn't the benevolent dictator model worked out well?
Fastdeath wrote:
On 2010-08-11 20:23, Kreuvf wrote:
Most important question: Why should we trust transifex?
Especially since that site is an interesting target (getting commit access to
whatever number of repositories transifex has access to) for attackers.
sf.net can get hacked to,
Christian Ohm wrote:
On Wednesday, 11 August 2010 at 20:23, Kreuvf wrote:
Why do we need this?
Because all talk about a private Pootle (or similar) installation fell on deaf
ears.
I've never seen such talk, but I don't read any forums except the internal ones
regularly :X And still I wonder
On Wednesday, 11 August 2010 at 21:18, Kreuvf wrote:
And please don't get me wrong: I am deeply convinced that translations can
only
be good (aka consistent) as long as there is one maintainer. I've already been
through this everybody can edit translations like stupid shit at Launchpad
