buginator wrote:
>
> Using msysgit and or TortoiseGit (which needs msysgit installed), the
> results are somewhat better, you can push, but, I ran into a fatal
> issue, that I couldn't resolve. It still is unstable, unless all you
> do is basic commands, like pull, commit, and push. Once you sta
On 5/3/10, Christian Ohm wrote:
>
> Since there seems to be no winner in the RCS discussion, we have basically
> two
> choices: 1. stay with SVN, 2. Decide on one of them (as backend at least).
> From
> what I've read, it seems it is easily possible to access a git repository
> with
> both
On 5/3/10, Gilles J. Seguin wrote:
> what is missing from
> git://gitorious.org/warzone2100/mainline.git
> ?
> what is problematic ?
> who is lost ? the administrators or the users
>
Are you asking if we are using that? Officially, not really. We are
still using SVN.
_
what is missing from
git://gitorious.org/warzone2100/mainline.git
?
what is problematic ?
who is lost ? the administrators or the users
thing i have not see discuss, you can have a repo been git, but all file
in a repository can also been managed by another version control
system.
that is, in a
Christian Ohm wrote:
> For direct access with git, you obviously need that installed (version 1.6+ I
> think). Cloning is done with "git clone [folder]", this will check out
> the data into "folder" (or the repo name "test" if you don't specify it). Then
> you do local changes, commit with "git co
Since there seems to be no winner in the RCS discussion, we have basically two
choices: 1. stay with SVN, 2. Decide on one of them (as backend at least). From
what I've read, it seems it is easily possible to access a git repository with
both hg and bzr. So I've set up a git repo for testing.
The
