Re: [warzone2100-dev] Pushing out 2.2.5 b 1 (or 2.3.0 b 1)
On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 7:09 PM, Christian Ohm chr@gmx.net wrote: Hey, I didn't decide that exactly. I'd branch 2.3 off from 2.2, and merge 2.2_net into it. Then we release 2.3 betas/rcs from that, and keep 2.2 and 2.3 in sync (apart from the netcode) until 2.3.0, accompanied by one last 2.2 release. Sounds like a lot of work... but I won't stand in the way if you want to do it. - Per ___ Warzone-dev mailing list Warzone-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/warzone-dev
Re: [warzone2100-dev] Pushing out 2.2.5 b 1 (or 2.3.0 b 1)
On Sunday, 8 November 2009 at 13:50, Per Inge Mathisen wrote: On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 7:09 PM, Christian Ohm chr@gmx.net wrote: Hey, I didn't decide that exactly. I'd branch 2.3 off from 2.2, and merge 2.2_net into it. Then we release 2.3 betas/rcs from that, and keep 2.2 and 2.3 in sync (apart from the netcode) until 2.3.0, accompanied by one last 2.2 release. Sounds like a lot of work... but I won't stand in the way if you want to do it. Well, that's what I would do, but I can't do the actual release builds etc. Not sure if anyone else wants to keep 2.2 around. But I don't think the 2.3 beta cycle should be very long, since most people will wait for a real release anyway, so the parallel 2.2/2.3 phase shouldn't be that much work. ___ Warzone-dev mailing list Warzone-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/warzone-dev
Re: [warzone2100-dev] Pushing out 2.2.5 b 1 (or 2.3.0 b 1)
On 11/8/09, Christian Ohm chr.xx...@x.net wrote: On Sunday, 8 November 2009 at 13:50, Per Inge Mathisen wrote: On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 7:09 PM, Christian Ohm chr.x...@.net wrote: Hey, I didn't decide that exactly. I'd branch 2.3 off from 2.2, and merge 2.2_net into it. Then we release 2.3 betas/rcs from that, and keep 2.2 and 2.3 in sync (apart from the netcode) until 2.3.0, accompanied by one last 2.2 release. Sounds like a lot of work... but I won't stand in the way if you want to do it. Well, that's what I would do, but I can't do the actual release builds etc. Not sure if anyone else wants to keep 2.2 around. But I don't think the 2.3 beta cycle should be very long, since most people will wait for a real release anyway, so the parallel 2.2/2.3 phase shouldn't be that much work. Sorry guys, can't get the newer dev package to work correctly, and I am out of time for doing a release today. Thus, it is postponed, until I get back next week. :( BTW, we would have 2.2_net, 2.2, 2.3.0 b1 (tag made from 2.2_net) and trunk...right? ___ Warzone-dev mailing list Warzone-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/warzone-dev
[warzone2100-dev] Pushing out 2.2.5 b 1 (or 2.3.0 b 1)
It is pretty obvious that we don't really have enough active developers to test everything ourselves and I think it would be best for us (and the project overall) if we start the ball rolling with a new release. 2.2_net is 2.2's code + trunk's netcode which means, people can play 8p games again... However, there could have been some other issues that crept in during the merge, and so, we need lots more people to test things. Should we release 2.2.5 b1, or just release it 2.3.0 b1 or what? The plan is to push out something by Sunday night to get the testing pool started. ___ Warzone-dev mailing list Warzone-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/warzone-dev
Re: [warzone2100-dev] Pushing out 2.2.5 b 1 (or 2.3.0 b 1)
Buginator, cybersphinx and me just decided to label the 2.2_net branch 2.3.0. - Kreuvf signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Warzone-dev mailing list Warzone-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/warzone-dev
Re: [warzone2100-dev] Pushing out 2.2.5 b 1 (or 2.3.0 b 1)
On Saturday, 7 November 2009 at 18:59, Kreuvf wrote: Buginator, cybersphinx and me just decided to label the 2.2_net branch 2.3.0. Hey, I didn't decide that exactly. I'd branch 2.3 off from 2.2, and merge 2.2_net into it. Then we release 2.3 betas/rcs from that, and keep 2.2 and 2.3 in sync (apart from the netcode) until 2.3.0, accompanied by one last 2.2 release. ___ Warzone-dev mailing list Warzone-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/warzone-dev
Re: [warzone2100-dev] Pushing out 2.2.5 b 1 (or 2.3.0 b 1)
Christian Ohm wrote: On Saturday, 7 November 2009 at 18:59, Kreuvf wrote: Buginator, cybersphinx and me just decided to label the 2.2_net branch 2.3.0. Hey, I didn't decide that exactly. I'd branch 2.3 off from 2.2, and merge 2.2_net into it. Then we release 2.3 betas/rcs from that, and keep 2.2 and 2.3 in sync (apart from the netcode) until 2.3.0, accompanied by one last 2.2 release. /me apologizes for misrepresenting cybersphinx's opinion. ;_; - Kreuvf signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Warzone-dev mailing list Warzone-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/warzone-dev
