On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 5:03 AM, wrote:
> Qt dies on this date, Tuesday, June 22, 2010.
> R.I.P
Is this supposed to be some kind of practical joke?
- Per
___
Warzone-dev mailing list
Warzone-dev@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/warzone-dev
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 2:10 AM, Per Inge Mathisen
wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 5:03 AM, wrote:
>> Qt dies on this date, Tuesday, June 22, 2010.
>> R.I.P
>
> Is this supposed to be some kind of practical joke?
It's not clear from the commit message (since the commit message is a
joke), but
#1939: Initial power amount in Gamma1 depending on how mission was started
-+--
Reporter: Emdek |Type: bug
Status: new |Priority: major
Milest
One thing we should consider backporting to 2.3 is the wavecast code,
which makes visibility a ton faster in trunk than in 2.3.
- Per
___
Warzone-dev mailing list
Warzone-dev@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/warzone-dev
#1940: Make asserts continuable (in gdb at least)
-+--
Reporter: cybersphinx | Owner:
Type: patch| Status: new
Priority: major| Milest
#1941: #include is invalid
-+--
Reporter: ohnobi...@… |Type: bug
Status: new |Priority: minor
Milestone: unspecified
On 6/23/10, Per Inge Mathisen wrote:
> One thing we should consider backporting to 2.3 is the wavecast code,
> which makes visibility a ton faster in trunk than in 2.3.
>
Though, that doesn't answer the question on what we should do with the
2.3 branch.
If we start to add features that do requir
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 5:40 AM, buginator wrote:
> If we start to add features that do require beta testing, what are we
> going to do ?
We could do beta testing...
- Per
___
Warzone-dev mailing list
Warzone-dev@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinf
