Christian Ohm schreef:
> On Thursday, 24 July 2008 at 2:00, Giel van Schijndel wrote:
>> Paul Wise schreef:
>>> On Wed, 2008-07-23 at 01:15 +0200, Giel van Schijndel wrote:
Any thoughts on this?
>>> Another beta might be a good idea, if it is done quickly.
>>>
>>> Also, when the final release
On Thursday, 24 July 2008 at 14:27, Dennis Schridde wrote:
> I assumed just the 2.1 part would be fixed, but 2.1.x bugfix releases would
> still go into future releases of Lenny and onto the update-servers?
I think there are only security updates, and a few point releases for
the whole distro. II
Am Donnerstag, 24. Juli 2008 13:47:17 schrieb Christian Ohm:
> On Thursday, 24 July 2008 at 2:00, Giel van Schijndel wrote:
> > either we decide that we do want our current state of 2.1 to be included
>
>
> I think that is the problem. If
On Thursday, 24 July 2008 at 9:28, Per Inge Mathisen wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 5:50 AM, bugs buggy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > For what it is worth, I rather have 2.1 (beta or not) be included, for the
> > simple fact that if it is not, then people keep submitting bugs for 2.0.10,
> > an
On Thursday, 24 July 2008 at 2:00, Giel van Schijndel wrote:
> Paul Wise schreef:
> > On Wed, 2008-07-23 at 01:15 +0200, Giel van Schijndel wrote:
> >> Any thoughts on this?
> >
> > Another beta might be a good idea, if it is done quickly.
> >
> > Also, when the final release is done, we can put
Giel van Schijndel wrote:
> Paul Wise schreef:
>> On Wed, 2008-07-23 at 01:15 +0200, Giel van Schijndel wrote:
>>> Any thoughts on this?
>> Another beta might be a good idea, if it is done quickly.
>>
>> Also, when the final release is done, we can put a warzone2100 backport
>> on backports.org for
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 5:50 AM, bugs buggy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For what it is worth, I rather have 2.1 (beta or not) be included, for the
> simple fact that if it is not, then people keep submitting bugs for 2.0.10,
> and that doesn't do anybody any good.
I do not think Debian ships 2.0.
On 7/23/08, Giel van Schijndel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Paul Wise schreef:
>
> > On Wed, 2008-07-23 at 01:15 +0200, Giel van Schijndel wrote:
> >> Any thoughts on this?
> >
> > Another beta might be a good idea, if it is done quickly.
> >
> > Also, when the final release is done, we can put a
Paul Wise schreef:
> On Wed, 2008-07-23 at 01:15 +0200, Giel van Schijndel wrote:
>> Any thoughts on this?
>
> Another beta might be a good idea, if it is done quickly.
>
> Also, when the final release is done, we can put a warzone2100 backport
> on backports.org for lenny users to upgrade to. Ma
On Wed, 2008-07-23 at 01:15 +0200, Giel van Schijndel wrote:
> Any thoughts on this?
Another beta might be a good idea, if it is done quickly.
Also, when the final release is done, we can put a warzone2100 backport
on backports.org for lenny users to upgrade to. Many people don't know
about back
10 matches
Mail list logo
