Re: [warzone2100-dev] Textures done, planning on a 'testing' build this weekend
On Friday, 15 October 2010 at 18:56, Per Inge Mathisen wrote: > If gitorious is so horrible, More like some people's connection to European servers is horrible (that's why we moved away from Gna as well...). ___ Warzone-dev mailing list Warzone-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/warzone-dev
Re: [warzone2100-dev] Textures done, planning on a 'testing' build this weekend
On 10/15/10, Giel van Schijndel wrote: > On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 06:56:32PM +0200, Per Inge Mathisen wrote: >> I'm a bit out of the loop, I guess, on the git stuff. Are we now all >> using gitorious, or are some people still hanging out at sf.net? If >> gitorious is so horrible, perhaps we should try github? I use that for >> another project at work with rather large data files, and it seems >> snappy. > > I believe GitHub used to have a space limit, I don't think they've got > one right now, though. In fact their website claims they don't have any > hard storage limits, instead they're using "soft" limits. Depending on > what they mean with "soft" limits I think using GitHub (instead of > gitorious) is probably a good idea. > > So unless there are some other reasons to prefer GitHub above Gitorious > which I'm unaware of I think moving to GitHub might be a good idea. Shortly after I was having issues (slow!) with gitorious, I asked the Guthub guys about the soft limit, and they said nothing yet. Dak then mirrored the gitorious repo on SF so I can do pulls from there. Has anyone tried the SF git repo besides Dak & I ? That is much faster than gitorious for me. ___ Warzone-dev mailing list Warzone-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/warzone-dev
Re: [warzone2100-dev] Textures done, planning on a 'testing' build this weekend
On 10/15/10, dak180 wrote: > On Oct 14, 2010, at 11:06 PM, buginator wrote: >> Everyone OK with a release this weekend ? > > Before we do any release that we want any sort of feedback on > http://developer.wz2100.net/ticket/2220 needs to be taken care of. While it would be nice if we could get that done, it isn't a blocker for doing a testing build. We could just hardcode the revision # for this testing build. On 10/15/10, Guangcong Luo wrote: > On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 3:06 AM, buginator wrote: >> MaNGusT has completed his work on the textures, so, it would be best >> to put out a 'testing' build ASAP and get feedback. >> >> Once that is done, we can commit the textures to git. > > Did he incorporate Jorzi's cliff textures yet? We should really get > working cliff textures ASAP. Nope, and if nobody does it, then it will sit on the forums, until the time someone does it. >> I also think >> http://developer.wz2100.net/attachment/ticket/2151/pre-3.0.patch >> should be applied as well, we really need feedback on those changes. > > Is that all the patches combined? You should really be more specific > with your patch descriptions. :/ It is, the way he had it, for his last patch. I just fixed the formatting mostly. For the name ... I thought it would be obvious to which one is was from. :P ___ Warzone-dev mailing list Warzone-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/warzone-dev
Re: [warzone2100-dev] Textures done, planning on a 'testing' build this weekend
On Oct 15, 2010, at 1:47 PM, Giel van Schijndel wrote: >> I'm a bit out of the loop, I guess, on the git stuff. Are we now all >> using gitorious, or are some people still hanging out at sf.net? If >> gitorious is so horrible, perhaps we should try github? I use that for >> another project at work with rather large data files, and it seems >> snappy. > > I believe GitHub used to have a space limit, I don't think they've got > one right now, though. In fact their website claims they don't have any > hard storage limits, instead they're using "soft" limits. Depending on > what they mean with "soft" limits I think using GitHub (instead of > gitorious) is probably a good idea. The reason that there are mirrors at sf.net is that some people get much better speeds from there. It also gives us an "it goes to hell (and never mind the hand basket)" option to continue work even if the primary repo is inaccessible. Personally I am all for using GitHub instead, if we can. For the soft limits we have two repos that break them and I am not sure if we would need to get their ok for each personal clone of these. -- My Web Sites: http://dak180.users.sourceforge.net/ ___ Warzone-dev mailing list Warzone-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/warzone-dev
Re: [warzone2100-dev] Textures done, planning on a 'testing' build this weekend
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 06:56:32PM +0200, Per Inge Mathisen wrote: > I'm a bit out of the loop, I guess, on the git stuff. Are we now all > using gitorious, or are some people still hanging out at sf.net? If > gitorious is so horrible, perhaps we should try github? I use that for > another project at work with rather large data files, and it seems > snappy. I believe GitHub used to have a space limit, I don't think they've got one right now, though. In fact their website claims they don't have any hard storage limits, instead they're using "soft" limits. Depending on what they mean with "soft" limits I think using GitHub (instead of gitorious) is probably a good idea. So unless there are some other reasons to prefer GitHub above Gitorious which I'm unaware of I think moving to GitHub might be a good idea. -- Giel -- "A computer is a stupid machine with the ability to do incredibly smart things, while computer programmers are smart people with the ability to do incredibly stupid things. They are, in short, a perfect match. -- Bill Bryson signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Warzone-dev mailing list Warzone-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/warzone-dev
Re: [warzone2100-dev] Textures done, planning on a 'testing' build this weekend
I'm a bit out of the loop, I guess, on the git stuff. Are we now all using gitorious, or are some people still hanging out at sf.net? If gitorious is so horrible, perhaps we should try github? I use that for another project at work with rather large data files, and it seems snappy. - Per ___ Warzone-dev mailing list Warzone-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/warzone-dev
Re: [warzone2100-dev] Textures done, planning on a 'testing' build this weekend
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 3:06 AM, buginator wrote: > MaNGusT has completed his work on the textures, so, it would be best > to put out a 'testing' build ASAP and get feedback. > > Once that is done, we can commit the textures to git. Did he incorporate Jorzi's cliff textures yet? We should really get working cliff textures ASAP. > I also think http://developer.wz2100.net/attachment/ticket/2151/pre-3.0.patch > should be applied as well, we really need feedback on those changes. Is that all the patches combined? You should really be more specific with your patch descriptions. :/ -Zarel ___ Warzone-dev mailing list Warzone-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/warzone-dev
Re: [warzone2100-dev] Textures done, planning on a 'testing' build this weekend
On Oct 14, 2010, at 11:06 PM, buginator wrote: > Everyone OK with a release this weekend ? Before we do any release that we want any sort of feedback on http://developer.wz2100.net/ticket/2220 needs to be taken care of. -- My Web Sites: http://dak180.users.sourceforge.net/ ___ Warzone-dev mailing list Warzone-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/warzone-dev
