Re: protocols

2011-05-30 Thread Yuri Z
AFAIK the GWT choice was made cause it allows to code once the OT module - the same code works on the server and the client and no need to synchronize the changes. Another advantage of GWT is the ability to render the waves on the server side re-using the rendering code of the client side. Again -

Re: protocols

2011-05-30 Thread ya knygar
About XMPP, as long as Wave built on XMPP, are someone here want to participate in making federation with http://buddycloud.com/ , for example? by federation i mean - we have our real-time typing and other goods, they receive our messages when they are in major revisions, or kind of, or, maybe

Re: protocols

2011-05-30 Thread ya knygar
Adrian, about prototyping and pseudo-code please take a look at https://github.com/JonathanAquino/noweb.py On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 6:41 PM, ya knygar kny...@gmail.com wrote: About XMPP, as long as Wave built on XMPP, are someone here want to participate in making federation with

Re: protocols

2011-05-30 Thread Adrian Cochrane
I have started writing the first standard, Federation Protocol, which (for reasons I already discussed) isn't changing much, but merely clarifying. It involves some C and (not too clearly psuedocode), and shortly DTD. I have also marked the top section up so that with a jQuery widget, it will

Sending the email notifications for WAVE Jira case to wave-dev instead of wave-commits list

2011-05-30 Thread Henry Saputra
Hi Wave communities, I am new to Wave project and looking forward to contribute to the success of Wave as incubator project. One suggestion if its better to send JIRA email notifications to wave-dev list instead of wave-commits list. The reasoning is that people may want to know about JIRA cases

Disable Register a new account

2011-05-30 Thread Nico Meisenzahl
Hi all, is there a possible solution to disable Register a new account function? So that only authorised user can create user-accounts. Or to use something like LDAP, or XMPP user account integration? Thanks! Von meinem iPad gesendet

Re: Disable Register a new account

2011-05-30 Thread Lennard de Rijk
Hi All, On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 21:43, Yuri Z vega...@gmail.com wrote: Regarding disabling registration: there's no such property in the server configuration, however, you can just remove the link in AuthenticationPage.gxp and then remove the mapping to the registration servlet in the

Re: protocols

2011-05-30 Thread Thomas Wrobel
Where have you written this? Did you manage to get site access? Also, are you sure Federation Protocol is a good name for the c/s protocol when the wave server protocol itself is also called wave Federation Protocol. I hate (really) hate wasting time discussing names but don't you think people

Re: protocols

2011-05-30 Thread Thomas Wrobel
Theres lots of ideas here, but maybe better discussed in a more general apache wave thread? Almost all of this is server/server stuff that would effect the wfp as a whole - not directly relevant to trying to make a common c/s standard to connect to wave servers. Not sure you will get many replies

Re: protocols

2011-05-30 Thread Perry Smith
I would definitely not have Federation in the name. Wave Client Server Protocol. If you want to be cute and stay with Firefly, call it Independent Protocol -- Oh... thats not going to work. Independent Client Server Protocol ? On May 30, 2011, at 6:31 PM, Adrian Cochrane wrote: I just

Re: protocols

2011-05-30 Thread Adrian Cochrane
I thought I said that this is NOT the client protocol, I'll get to that later, I'm just clarifying the existing Federation protocol. -- Adrian Cochrane alci...@eml.cc On Mon, 30 May 2011 19:50 -0500, Perry Smith pedz...@gmail.com wrote: I would definitely not have Federation in the name.