I guess that could be useful.
How about something like this?
# apt-get install mercurial ant default-jdk eclipse
$ hg clone https://wave-protocol.googlecode.com/hg wave-in-a-box
$ cd wave-in-a-box
$ ant compile-gwt
$ ant dist-server
$ ant -f server-config.xml -Dsigner_info_store_type=file
Does that show up as an official set of instructions when I google
wave-in-a-box? I don't see that site on the first page when I google.
Pretend you know nothing about the project and just want to get
started. Now start googling and reading links and the official pages.
I think you will find
Yes there is too much outdated information in too many places. There should
only
be one official wiki on Apache. Google pages, should only refer to it.
From: Daniel Wilkerson daniel.wilker...@gmail.com
To: Yuri Z vega...@gmail.com
Cc:
Please, do feel free to duplicate the contents of my blog wherever is
needed; it's all CC licensed unless noted otherwise (see footer of
blog for more details).
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 11:34, Daniel Wilkerson
daniel.wilker...@gmail.com wrote:
Does that show up as an official set of instructions
+1
On 2 September 2011 15:28, Bruno Gonzalez sten...@gmail.com wrote:
Please, do feel free to duplicate the contents of my blog wherever is
needed; it's all CC licensed unless noted otherwise (see footer of
blog for more details).
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 11:34, Daniel Wilkerson
All,
There has been several threads on the usefulness of the current wave web site,
the lack of consolidated information, and the feasibility of maintaining the
current site. I would like to get some ideas on the infrastructure we should
use to maintain the site. I strongly believe that we
On Sep 2, 2011, at 10:20 AM, Michael MacFadden wrote:
Basically, I feel like for a project that represents a web-based technology,
it is important for us to have a good looking, easily updatable, and usable
web site. After all if we can't present a well designed and good looking web
My first question would be: what is wrong with the Apache CMS? It's back
end isn't pretty (volunteers accepted to make it pretty), but it allows
for the site to be edited via a UI and via command line/SVN.
The main requirement that Apache places upon its websites is that the
site is served as
2p
In terms of saving time. I would go for wordpress. it is not some people's idea
of elegant under the hood, I used to be cynical, but in practice it is the most
versatile CMS, and has a wide selection of plugins, and is easy to develop..
Chances are you have everything you want.
Joolma is
I think they should keep the Apache CMS to meet the basic requirements, but as
a
focal point to pull everything together I don't see a problem with an external
site done well. Interest need to be generated.
At the moment through no fault the project is spread across several sites, and
In regards to the current Apache CMS, which we are currently using are:
No one knows how to use it. No it's not that complicated, and yes we can learn
it. But it's just one more hurdle for new developers.
The wiki language doesn't seem to have the ability to create tables, or other
common
On Fri, 02 Sep 2011 07:57 -0700, Michael MacFadden
michael.macfad...@gmail.com wrote:
In regards to the current Apache CMS, which we are currently using are:
No one knows how to use it. No it's not that complicated, and yes we can
learn it. But it's just one more hurdle for new
You could use another interface to generate content privately, the cached
output
could be upload as static html on Apache CMS. Personally I don't think raw html
is a massive hurdle, just it is more convenient, and less likelihood of
malformed code, with a good editor. If it is statically
Wordpress +1
Nathan Wells
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 9:36 AM, Michael MacFadden
michael.macfad...@gmail.com wrote:
k the infrastructure team about the CMS. The re
ah, cheers for that.
I'll get to the changes over the next week )
~~
Reviews of anything, by anyone;
www.rateoholic.co.uk
Please try out my new site and give feedback :)
On 31 August 2011 11:49, Yuri Z vega...@gmail.com wrote:
Yeah, that's what I intended to say. I think that Google Wave
15 matches
Mail list logo
