ah, cheers for that. I'll get to the changes over the next week ) ~~~~~~ Reviews of anything, by anyone; www.rateoholic.co.uk Please try out my new site and give feedback :)
On 31 August 2011 11:49, Yuri Z <[email protected]> wrote: > Yeah, that's what I intended to say. I think that Google Wave is better > suited for collaboration on a document than Google Docs. > Actually I already did it - copied the contents of the doc created by Thomas > into a wave and made it public. The wave can be found at: > https://wave.google.com/wave/waveref/googlewave.com/w+EzBfK0s1A/~/conv+root/b+EzBfK0s1B > > > > On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 11:00 PM, Zachary “Gamer_Z.” Yaro > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> By "Google Wave" I think he meant wave.google.com, which, at the moment, >> is >> a bit more stable and reliable than WIAB (no offense to Yuri's setup). >> >> --Zachary “Gamer_Z.” Yaro >> >> >> On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 15:56, Thomas Wrobel <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > You mean at; >> > http://waveinabox.net/ >> > I thought of that , but I cant seem to load it. >> > >> > "A turbulence detected! >> > >> > Please save your last changes to somewhere and reload the wave." >> > >> > (starts as soon as a load - Chrome 14.0.835.109 beta-m. Doesn't work >> > on the Beta of chrome?) >> > >> > >> > On 29 August 2011 19:42, Yuri Z <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > Great work Thomas, thanks! >> > > Just one suggestion - can we move the discussion to Google Wave? >> > > >> > > On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 8:35 PM, Thomas Wrobel <[email protected]> >> > wrote: >> > > >> > >> I wrote a early draft here; >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> https://docs.google.com/document/pub?id=14AbilsPE6NRTwBildiTtSQ4I5T3Is7lbmgHnUt95lMc >> > >> >> > >> Let me know if I am going along the right lines, and I'll correct/add >> > >> to based on feedback. >> > >> >> > >> -Thomas >> > >> >> > >> ~~~~~~ >> > >> Reviews of anything, by anyone; >> > >> www.rateoholic.co.uk >> > >> Please try out my new site and give feedback :) >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> On 29 August 2011 17:16, Michael MacFadden < >> [email protected] >> > > >> > >> wrote: >> > >> > done. >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > On Aug 29, 2011, at 7:16 AM, Yuri Z wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> >> @Michael, Can you please add Thomas to contributors so he would be >> > able >> > >> to assign the JIRA task to himself? >> > >> >> >> > >> >> On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 5:14 PM, Yuri Z <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> >> Yeah :) Thanks >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 5:09 PM, Thomas Wrobel < >> [email protected]> >> > >> wrote: >> > >> >> Would this do as the task; >> > >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WAVE-290 >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> On 29 August 2011 15:50, Paul Thomas <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> >> > Epic? WAIB goes under there. >> > >> >> > >> > >> >> > >> > >> >> > >> > >> >> > ________________________________ >> > >> >> > From: Thomas Wrobel <[email protected]> >> > >> >> > To: [email protected] >> > >> >> > Sent: Mon, 29 August, 2011 14:30:16 >> > >> >> > Subject: Re: Update Wiki for Apache Wave >> > >> >> > >> > >> >> > Sure...should I categorise this as just a "TASK" or maybe a >> > >> >> > "STORY".....kinda new to all this so not sure what category this >> > issue >> > >> >> > would fall under. (I dread to think what gets put under "EPIC" !) >> > >> >> > >> > >> >> > -Thomas >> > >> >> > >> > >> >> > ~~~~~~ >> > >> >> > Reviews of anything, by anyone; >> > >> >> > www.rateoholic.co.uk >> > >> >> > Please try out my new site and give feedback :) >> > >> >> > >> > >> >> > >> > >> >> > >> > >> >> > On 29 August 2011 14:44, Yuri Z <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> >> >> Thanks for picking this up Thomas. You can open an issue in the >> > Wave >> > >> JIRA >> > >> >> >> for this and assign it to yourself. >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Thomas Wrobel < >> > [email protected]> >> > >> wrote: >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >>> Seeing as I didn't have much luck picking apart the code, I >> could >> > >> have >> > >> >> >>> a go at this. At least to put more details in then there is >> now. >> > >> >> >>> >> > >> >> >>> Probably need checking over after I'm done for accuracy/missing >> > >> >> >>> information. (and spelling...) >> > >> >> >>> >> > >> >> >>> Shall I sign up for the task? >> > >> >> >>> >> > >> >> >>> -Thomas Wrobel >> > >> >> >>> >> > >> >> >>> ~~~~~~ >> > >> >> >>> Reviews of anything, by anyone; >> > >> >> >>> www.rateoholic.co.uk >> > >> >> >>> Please try out my new site and give feedback :) >> > >> >> >>> >> > >> >> >>> >> > >> >> >>> >> > >> >> >>> On 27 August 2011 14:09, Yuri Z <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> >> >>> > I think a good first step for creation Apache Wave Wiki page >> > would >> > >> be >> > >> >> >>> fill >> > >> >> >>> > in the "History" part of the "About Apache Wave" page at >> > >> >> >>> > http://incubator.apache.org/wave/about.html. >> > >> >> >>> > >> > >> >> >>> > Currently the "History" contains the following TODO: "Lets >> > >> summarize >> > >> >> >>> Google >> > >> >> >>> > Wave, Fed One, Wave in a Box, Apache Wave, the protocol, etc. >> > It >> > >> will be >> > >> >> >>> > interesting to keep this information for people to understand >> > how >> > >> the >> > >> >> >>> > project has evolved." >> > >> >> >>> > >> > >> >> >>> > Would be great of someone would take on the task to address >> > this >> > >> TODO. >> > >> >> >>> > >> > >> >> >>> > On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 8:41 AM, Yuri Z <[email protected]> >> > >> wrote: >> > >> >> >>> > >> > >> >> >>> >> Great! Thanks for taking on this! >> > >> >> >>> >> >> > >> >> >>> >> >> > >> >> >>> >> 2011/8/10 Jérémy Naegel <[email protected]> >> > >> >> >>> >> >> > >> >> >>> >>> Suggestion made here : >> > >> >> >>> >>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Apache_Wave#Apache_Wave >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > >> >> >>> >>> - Jeremy >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > >> >> >>> >>> On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 6:24 PM, Jérémy Naegel < >> > >> [email protected]> >> > >> >> >>> >>> wrote: >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > >> >> >>> >>> > What I'm not familiar with is the Wikipedia revision / >> > >> revocation of >> > >> >> >>> >>> > changes policy... >> > >> >> >>> >>> > >> > >> >> >>> >>> > I'll try to suggest that change inside the discussion >> page >> > and >> > >> see if >> > >> >> >>> it >> > >> >> >>> >>> > triggers any reaction. >> > >> >> >>> >>> > After a few days without reactions or with positive >> > reactions, >> > >> I >> > >> >> >>> guess >> > >> >> >>> >>> it >> > >> >> >>> >>> > would be OK to change back the title. >> > >> >> >>> >>> > >> > >> >> >>> >>> > Then it will be possible to create a new "Apache Wave" >> > entry >> > >> (as it >> > >> >> >>> >>> won't >> > >> >> >>> >>> > be a duplicate). >> > >> >> >>> >>> > I could start it, with the Apache Wave website definition >> > and >> > >> some >> > >> >> >>> >>> general >> > >> >> >>> >>> > infos, but I won't be able to add technical details. >> > >> >> >>> >>> > >> > >> >> >>> >>> > Btw, If someone whose mother tongue is English wants to >> > help, >> > >> that >> > >> >> >>> would >> > >> >> >>> >>> be >> > >> >> >>> >>> > much appreciated! >> > >> >> >>> >>> > >> > >> >> >>> >>> > - Jeremy >> > >> >> >>> >>> > >> > >> >> >>> >>> > >> > >> >> >>> >>> > >> > >> >> >>> >>> > On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 1:11 PM, Yuri Z < >> [email protected] >> > > >> > >> wrote: >> > >> >> >>> >>> > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> I see. So I guess that's what should be done. The entry >> > >> should be >> > >> >> >>> >>> renamed >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> back to Google Wave and a new entry for Apache Wave (and >> > Wave >> > >> in a >> > >> >> >>> Box) >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> should be created. >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> I am not that familiar with the standards for creating >> > Wiki >> > >> entries, >> > >> >> >>> >>> also, >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> I personally would prefer to spend my spare time on >> > actually >> > >> >> >>> creating >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> patches for WIAB. So I thought that maybe some non >> > technical >> > >> >> >>> community >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> member would like to take on this (actually very >> > important) >> > >> task. >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> 2011/8/10 Jérémy Naegel <[email protected]> >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > About this Apache Wave Wikipedia page : It was, up >> until >> > a >> > >> couple >> > >> >> >>> of >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > months, >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > the Google Wave page and it has simply been renamed >> > Apache >> > >> Wave. I >> > >> >> >>> >>> think >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> it >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > was a bad move, this page should have stayed the >> Google >> > >> Wave page >> > >> >> >>> >>> since >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > Google Wave is still an existing service, and a new >> > Apache >> > >> Wave >> > >> >> >>> page >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> should >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > have been created from scratch since it's a fresh >> start >> > for >> > >> the >> > >> >> >>> >>> product. >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> I >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > think the renaming edit of the page should simply be >> > >> undone, but I >> > >> >> >>> >>> guess >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > this will trigger a debate among the contributors. >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > - Jeremy >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Dan Peterson < >> > >> >> >>> [email protected] >> > >> >> >>> >>> > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > wrote: >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > > Agreed -- go for it! >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > > ----- Original Message ----- >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > > From: Upayavira [mailto:[email protected]] >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > > Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 04:33 AM >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > > To: [email protected] < >> > >> >> >>> [email protected]> >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > > Subject: Re: Update Wiki for Apache Wave >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > > I'd say just do it. If anyone wants to help, they >> will >> > >> have an >> > >> >> >>> >>> 'edit' >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > > button too. >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > > Upayavira >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > > On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 22:25 +0300, "Yuri Z" < >> > >> [email protected]> >> > >> >> >>> >>> wrote: >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > > > I stumbled upon the Wiki page for Apache >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > > > Wave<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apache_Wave>- >> and >> > my >> > >> >> >>> >>> impression >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> was >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > > > that it's of very low quality and conveys very >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > > > little information about Apache Wave and Wave in a >> > Box >> > >> >> >>> project. >> > >> >> >>> >>> Most >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> of >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > > > the >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > > > information is related to Google Wave. I thought >> > that >> > >> it >> > >> >> >>> could >> > >> >> >>> >>> be >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> nice >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > > > to >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > > > discuss how we can improve /restructure the Wiki >> > entry >> > >> for >> > >> >> >>> Apache >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> Wave. >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> >> > >> >> >>> >>> > >> > >> >> >>> >>> > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > >> >> >>> >> >> > >> >> >>> > >> > >> >> >>> >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> > >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> >> > > >> > >> >
