David,
I've had some time to become familiar with the current client/server protocol.
I'm fairly comfortable with the current protocol, and have created/hacked out a
client that is considerably different than the current client.
I'm excited to hear that there is/was a protocol being developed
BTW Thomas, are you working on this issue? If so, can you please assign it
to yourself in the Wave Jira?
2011/7/17 Thomas Wrobel darkfl...@gmail.com
hu?
Auto-Linking was the first starter project on the list;
/Server protocol (again)
BTW Thomas, are you working on this issue? If so, can you please assign it
to yourself in the Wave Jira?
2011/7/17 Thomas Wrobel darkfl...@gmail.com
hu?
Auto-Linking was the first starter project on the list;
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa
I'm trying too. Was struggleing to understand how the editor worked
and I wasnt yet confident enough to say I could do it.
-Thomas
On 19 July 2011 23:06, Yuri Z vega...@gmail.com wrote:
BTW Thomas, are you working on this issue? If so, can you please assign it
to yourself in the Wave Jira?
that not dealing with this issue, might be detrimental, it is
going
to get harder to do later, no?
From: Yuri Z vega...@gmail.com
To: wave-dev@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Tue, 19 July, 2011 22:06:25
Subject: Re: Client/Server protocol (again)
BTW Thomas
, no?
From: Yuri Z vega...@gmail.com
To: wave-dev@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Tue, 19 July, 2011 22:06:25
Subject: Re: Client/Server protocol (again)
BTW Thomas, are you working on this issue? If so, can you please assign it
to yourself in the Wave Jira?
2011/7/17 Thomas Wrobel darkfl
Thanks, might have to take you up on that at some point.
For the moment I'm just looking around the code trying to work out how
it works and where the new code will need to go for the Auto-Linking
hu?
Auto-Linking was the first starter project on the list;
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=truejqlQuery=labels+%3D+StarterProject
Thats what I was trying to do.
-Thomas
On 17 July 2011 14:55, Yuri Z vega...@gmail.com wrote:
IMHO, you should be looking at diff
Been away a bit, so sorry for the delay.
Thanks for all the information, this is incredibly useful.
I'm going to start with doing one of the..well, starter projects and
see how well I handle that. If that goes smooth I'll investigating how
the protocol is currently working (code-wise) and see if
Great, let me know if you run out of the StarterProjects :)
2011/7/15 Thomas Wrobel darkfl...@gmail.com
Been away a bit, so sorry for the delay.
Thanks for all the information, this is incredibly useful.
I'm going to start with doing one of the..well, starter projects and
see how well I
IMHO, for WIAB developing purposes there's no real difference which OS to
use.
2011/7/15 Thomas Wrobel darkfl...@gmail.com
err..sure.
That could take awhile, still getting set up here. :)
Got the Wave Panel Harness to work, but eclipse refuses to make a
connection for debugging (firewall
If you need any help getting thing going, I would be more than happy to help.
We could do desktop sharing through skype or something.
~Michael
On Jul 15, 2011, at 12:12 PM, Thomas Wrobel wrote:
err..sure.
That could take awhile, still getting set up here. :)
Got the Wave Panel Harness to
I have to point out, none of these solutions are actually federated -
and thus unsuitable for anyone wishing to make a open network where
anyone can run a server.
WFP and WIAB was the highest! priority for pyofwave.info,
we could say - the PyOfWave was the only besides WIAB which
were aimed for
On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 8:19 AM, Thomas Wrobel darkfl...@gmail.com wrote:
As far as I know, the client-server protocol for wave in a box is
pretty stable at this point. Its documented here:
http://www.waveprotocol.org/protocol/design-proposals/clientserver-protocol
... Though that documentation
excuse me, it's https://apps.mozillalabs.COM/
anyway - their recent work looks like from a great non-profit organization :)
On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 7:21 PM, ya knygar kny...@gmail.com wrote:
Scott Wilson,
your
https://github.com/scottbw/wave-node
work and experience, W3C or WHATWG web apps
On 9 Jul 2011, at 20:24, ya knygar wrote:
excuse me, it's https://apps.mozillalabs.COM/
anyway - their recent work looks like from a great non-profit organization :)
As indeed is Apache :-)
Certainly there are a lot of real-time services and specifications around at
the moment that have OT
Heh - that looks like sharejs:
https://github.com/josephg/ShareJS/
I don't have a committee, but I've got OT-based syncronization of
arbitrary JSON objects working. So you can write web apps and keep
complex data structures synced up.
There's a lot of little OT projects popping up at the moment.
I have to point out, none of these solutions are actually federated -
and thus unsuitable for anyone wishing to make a open network where
anyone can run a server. Bunchs of individual OT projects are great
for specific uses, but for anyone wanting a open network, their not
really relevant.
WFP is
On 8 Jul 2011, at 17:27, Joseph Gentle wrote:
Heh - that looks like sharejs:
https://github.com/josephg/ShareJS/
I don't have a committee, but I've got OT-based syncronization of
arbitrary JSON objects working. So you can write web apps and keep
complex data structures synced up.
I wondered if there was any interest again in helping push forward a
stable client/server protocol for wiab?
A few weeks back there was a thread started
(http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-wave-dev/201106.mbox/thread),
which then developed into a interesting discussion on
Hi Rohit Rai!
thank you for the link,
very interesting, indeed.
please - post as much as possible from what you have discovered
into http://primarypad.com/OeMj2ZnZqo
it will, definitely, help Wave protocols to evolve.
21 matches
Mail list logo
