Heh - that looks like sharejs: https://github.com/josephg/ShareJS/
I don't have a committee, but I've got OT-based syncronization of arbitrary JSON objects working. So you can write web apps and keep complex data structures synced up. There's a lot of little OT projects popping up at the moment. I don't think you're alone in fleeing from fedone's code base. -J On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 4:31 AM, Rohit Rai <rohitb...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Guys, > > I haven't been able to invest much time on wave... found it the code too > cumbersome to work with... but thats a long rant I won't bother with. > > I just keep tabs on the development of the project. I was only interested in > the OT part of it and it was not documented and lack of documented > client/server protocol didn't help! GWT was the final deal breaker :D > > But when I left wave for and started looking for something else, I found > many things on the way... but the one that took my attention was > http://opencoweb.org/ > > An OT framework, both for Python and Java with a lot of documentation and a > well defined Javascript client API and a proper documented client/server API > based on Bauyex. > > I hope it can help to establish a good client server protocol base for > others too. > > Regards, > Rohit > > The diamond cannot be polished without friction, nor man perfected without > trials > http://mytechrantings.blogspot.com > > > On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 9:29 PM, Thomas Wrobel <darkfl...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I wondered if there was any interest again in helping push forward a >> stable client/server protocol for wiab? >> >> A few weeks back there was a thread started >> ( >> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-wave-dev/201106.mbox/thread >> ), >> which then developed into a interesting discussion on protocols for >> wave (and wave-like) systems in general. >> >> However, the original intention (at least, from my perspective) of >> trying to push for a simple c/s interface for wiab...allowing anyone >> to write a client and connect to any standard wiab server.....seemed >> to have been lost. >> So I wondered if anyone was up for trying to work on it? I'm willing >> to help out as much as I can - although I'm mostly a java client >> coder, with little knowledge of the inner code of wiab. I could mock >> up basic clients to test the protocol with a lot easier then making >> wiab modifications. However, in either case, I'm willing to learn and >> put in the time if it means getting this functionality added. >> >> I'm assuming any c/s for wiab will be still based around there proposal >> here; >> http://www.waveprotocol.org/protocol/design-proposals/clientserver-protocol >> >> -Thomas Wrobel >> arwave.org >> >> >> >> ~~~~~~ >> Reviews of anything, by anyone; >> www.rateoholic.co.uk >> Please try out my new site and give feedback :) >> >
