January 2012, 2:52
Subject: Re: Wave: Distributed forum?
Hello all,
I'm not a WIAB contributor, but I'd like to contribute a lurker's
thoughts to this particular discussion.
The fundamental innovation of Wave is that it recognizes that
instant messages, forum posts, blog entries, documents
,
and interest.
From: Nathan Simpson nathaniel.simp...@gmail.com
To: wave-dev@incubator.apache.org; Paul Thomas dt01pqt...@yahoo.com
Sent: Friday, 6 January 2012, 15:34
Subject: Re: Wave: Distributed forum?
It's mostly theoretical in the context of WIAB
.
From: Nathan Simpson nathaniel.simp...@gmail.com
To: wave-dev@incubator.apache.org; Paul Thomas dt01pqt...@yahoo.com
Sent: Friday, 6 January 2012, 15:34
Subject: Re: Wave: Distributed forum?
It's mostly theoretical in the context of WIAB. With Google Wave
Hi Doug
Wave is many things, and is useful in many ways. Everyone sees some subset
of its feature as the core features. I personally think that the
following features define Wave:
1. Centralized model - everything is on the server. No fragmentation of
information like in emails.
2.
Sure, I totally agree with the points you've raised.
I just don't see how wiab addresses them, or realistically has any roadmap
to addressing them.
To be a compelling offering wiab seems to be trying to duplicate what
google wave was (and fair enough, that was the goal right?) but that means:
. But I don't think interested will be stoked, until it is
adaptable to fit any use case.
IMO Ham radio is less obscure.
From: Doug douglas.lin...@gmail.com
To: wave-dev@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, 5 January 2012, 23:57
Subject: Re: Wave: Distributed forum
Idly I was thinking today about things I liked about wave and things I
didn't and it struck me all the things I used wave for were the same thing
I used a forum for:
You have multiple threaded conversions between groups of people, some of
which take place in public, some in small private groups.
