https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99268
Bug 99268 depends on bug 98799, which changed state.
Bug 98799 Summary: "Clickfinger" behavior interferes with normal operation when
a thumb is resting on the bottom of the touchpad
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98799
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98799
Peter Hutterer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |MOVED
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103461
--- Comment #1 from zwhitch...@gmail.com ---
Ok, figured out, it was in
So, these are the dependencies I was missing:
doxygen
graphviz
libgtk-3-dev
check
valgrind
If anyone else is having this problem, here's a command you can just copy and
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103461
Bug ID: 103461
Summary: build dependencies documentation doesn't work on my
machine
Product: Wayland
Version: unspecified
Hardware: Other
OS: All
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102811
Peter Hutterer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEEDINFO
--
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99306
Peter Hutterer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=772909
Matthias Clasen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mcla...@redhat.com
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100571
Peter Hutterer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103330
--- Comment #11 from Peter Hutterer ---
oops, thanks. I pushed a fix as
commit ed52002c8ddeac218ae88231d5a8f759f8733266 (tmp-today/master)
Author: Peter Hutterer
Date: Mon Oct 23 15:30:41
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=775217
Matthias Clasen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #349742|none|committed
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=775217
Matthias Clasen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98839
--- Comment #52 from Peter Hutterer ---
Give this branch a try please, thanks:
https://github.com/whot/libinput/tree/wip/touchpad-hysteresis-issues-v2
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100043
--- Comment #16 from Peter Hutterer ---
Martin: best to file a new bug, attach an evemu-describe of the device and we
can fix it from there.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103395
Peter Hutterer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |NOTOURBUG
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103149
--- Comment #4 from Martin Jørgensen ---
I'm experiencing the same issue as JanUlirich on my Thinkpad X1 Carbon running
Debian buster/sid, libinput 1.8.2 and linux 4.13.0-7.2-liquorix-amd64.
After returning from suspend my
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98689
--- Comment #12 from Alex Corcoles ---
Hi,
That's fine, no worries.
For reference and future visitors from Google, what I found acceptable is to
follow the advice from:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103395
--- Comment #6 from akktor ---
Created attachment 135041
--> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=135041=edit
evemu-record
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=789141
--- Comment #12 from Debarshi Ray ---
(In reply to Andrea Azzarone from comment #11)
> (In reply to Debarshi Ray from comment #10)
> > Review of attachment 361918 [details] [review] [review]:
> >
> > ::: gdk/gdkwindow.c
> >
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=789141
--- Comment #11 from Andrea Azzarone ---
(In reply to Debarshi Ray from comment #10)
> Review of attachment 361918 [details] [review]:
>
> ::: gdk/gdkwindow.c
> @@ +3926,1 @@
> _gdk_make_event (window,
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=789141
--- Comment #10 from Debarshi Ray ---
Review of attachment 361918:
::: gdk/gdkwindow.c
@@ +3926,1 @@
_gdk_make_event (window, GDK_UNMAP, NULL, FALSE);
Fly-by comment: this line makes me think that this patch was
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103437
--- Comment #1 from Pekka Paalanen ---
Am I reading that report correctly that the uninitialized bytes are in a region
allocated by calloc()?
Is that a mistake in the analysis, or do we first copy uninitialized data into
21 matches
Mail list logo