Hi,
If we want this in an initial minimalistic xdg_shell version, this needs
to be targetted at xdg_shell unstable v6, which currently lives on a
branch and as set of proposed patches. We cannot add this to version 5
anyhow.
If we indeed want this in the core protocol now, and not in some
Hi Jasper,
> > [...]
> > +
> > +If never set, the size of the surface is not limited by the
> > client.
> > +
> > +A value of zero for either width, height or both means that the
> > +client has no preference regarding the maximum size in the given
> > +dimension.
On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 2:36 AM, Olivier Fourdan wrote:
> Some application may wish to restrict their window in size, but
> xdg-shell has no mechanism for the client to advertise such a maximum
> or minimum size the compositor can use.
>
> As a result, the compositor may try
On Wed, 6 Apr 2016 04:03:31 -0400 (EDT)
Olivier Fourdan wrote:
> Hi Bill,
>
> > I think it would be ok to set both the minimum and maximum with a single
> > request.
>
> Yes, agreed.
Why, what good does it do?
We have regretted before of putting two different things in
Hi Bill,
> I think it would be ok to set both the minimum and maximum with a single
> request.
Yes, agreed.
Cheers,
Olivier
___
wayland-devel mailing list
wayland-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Some application may wish to restrict their window in size, but
xdg-shell has no mechanism for the client to advertise such a maximum
or minimum size the compositor can use.
As a result, the compositor may try to maximize or fullscreen a window
while the client would not allow for the requested