On Wed, 6 Apr 2016 04:03:31 -0400 (EDT) Olivier Fourdan <ofour...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi Bill, > > > I think it would be ok to set both the minimum and maximum with a single > > request. > > Yes, agreed. Why, what good does it do? We have regretted before of putting two different things in the same request when they do not necessarily have to be in the same request (wl_surface.attach buffer vs. x,y), and there are no performance reasons in this case either. Unless there actually is a reason to put two things into one request (e.g. width and height that don't make sense separated) then it should be done, but if there is no such clear logical or obvious performance reason, I would err on the side of making separate requests. It's also a documentation thing, if some of the arguments behave one way and others behave slightly differently. I have never wished to be able to combine two requests into one, but I have several time wished to be able to split a request into two by its arguments. So if you are sure that all clients will always submit those two requests both at the same go, then please do merge them. Otherwise I'd favour separating them. Thanks, pq
pgpqU5Llmrydz.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ wayland-devel mailing list wayland-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-devel
