On Fri, 8 Jul 2016 11:31:42 +0100
Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 7 July 2016 at 19:18, Quentin Glidic
> wrote:
> > On 07/07/2016 18:28, Emil Velikov wrote:
> >>
> >> On 7 July 2016 at 10:20, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
>
On 7 July 2016 at 19:18, Quentin Glidic wrote:
> On 07/07/2016 18:28, Emil Velikov wrote:
>>
>> On 7 July 2016 at 10:20, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
>>>
>>> [snip]
>>> Therefore a NAK from me too.
>>>
>> As you guys wish. In that case can we drop
On 07/07/2016 18:28, Emil Velikov wrote:
On 7 July 2016 at 10:20, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
[snip]
Therefore a NAK from me too.
As you guys wish. In that case can we drop the pkgincludedir variable
? Most packages don't bother with it (on my local setup only 7 out of
740 do)
On 7 July 2016 at 10:20, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Jul 2016 16:02:23 +0100
> Emil Velikov wrote:
>
>> On 4 July 2016 at 15:32, Quentin Glidic
>> wrote:
>> > On 04/07/2016 16:23, Emil Velikov wrote:
>> >>
>>
On Mon, 4 Jul 2016 16:02:23 +0100
Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 4 July 2016 at 15:32, Quentin Glidic
> wrote:
> > On 04/07/2016 16:23, Emil Velikov wrote:
> >>
> >> From: Emil Velikov
> >>
> >> When managing
On 4 July 2016 at 15:32, Quentin Glidic wrote:
> On 04/07/2016 16:23, Emil Velikov wrote:
>>
>> From: Emil Velikov
>>
>> When managing headers there's normally two ways to handle them
>> - with or without the subfolder.
>>
>> Opting
On 04/07/2016 16:23, Emil Velikov wrote:
From: Emil Velikov
When managing headers there's normally two ways to handle them
- with or without the subfolder.
Opting for the latter case here, since it will provide direct feedback,
whether one is using libweston-0 or