On Thu, 27 Mar 2014 04:08:15 +
Wang, Quanxian quanxian.w...@intel.com wrote:
Hi, Pq
The information to identify the unique mode: width, height and refresh are
enough? Not enough in theory. But is enough in real world. I have checked
with xrandr. Read the following comment.
Welcome
I don't think the user really knows what refresh is either.
I'm actually curious: is there a reason to ever expose different modes to
the user that have the same width/height but different timings? What's the
rationale for choosing one instead of the other? I know nothing about
display panels,
On Thu, 27 Mar 2014 08:31:34 -0400
Jasper St. Pierre jstpie...@mecheye.net wrote:
I don't think the user really knows what refresh is either.
I'm actually curious: is there a reason to ever expose different modes to
the user that have the same width/height but different timings? What's the
I mean, I'm mostly talking about user configuration in the case of a
desktop, when the user wants to change the mode of the display.
Obviously, it would be best if we could detect hardware edge cases like
that where it's going on the fritz and showing a green tint automatically,
and simply not
-Original Message-
From: Pekka Paalanen [mailto:ppaala...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2014 9:06 PM
To: Jasper St. Pierre
Cc: Wang, Quanxian; wayland-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: weston: weston randr protocol for testing and configuration
On Thu, 27 Mar 2014 08:31:34
: weston: weston randr protocol for testing and configuration
Talking about threads here is misleading. Such threaded operations do not make
sense to begin with. The question is more about ambiguity between operations
and acknowledgements, and preferring explicit correspondence than relying
, March 22, 2014 8:20 PM
To: Wang, Quanxian
Cc: wayland-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: weston: weston randr protocol for testing and configuration
Talking about threads here is misleading. Such threaded operations do not
make
sense to begin with. The question is more about ambiguity
: Saturday, March 22, 2014 8:20 PM
To: Wang, Quanxian
Cc: wayland-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: weston: weston randr protocol for testing and
configuration
Talking about threads here is misleading. Such threaded operations do
not make sense to begin with. The question is more about
: wayland-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: weston: weston randr protocol for testing and configuration
On Wed, 26 Mar 2014 06:47:50 +
Wang, Quanxian quanxian.w...@intel.com wrote:
Hi, Pq
In weston randr v2, I don't include the following question. I am still in
confused.
Sorry
-
From: wayland-devel [mailto:wayland-devel-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org]
On
Behalf Of Pekka Paalanen
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2014 3:54 PM
To: Wang, Quanxian
Cc: wayland-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: weston: weston randr protocol for testing and configuration
On Wed, 26
There certainly should be no need to worry about multiple threads from
the same client. I think you can work on the assumption that the
programmer who wrote the client is not insane! This is the way commit
for wl_surface works, right?
The per-client pending mode is probably cleanest, but I
Hi, Pq
The information to identify the unique mode: width, height and refresh are
enough? Not enough in theory. But is enough in real world. I have checked with
xrandr. Read the following comment.
Welcome any comment for that.
Thanks
+
+request name=set_mode
+ description
Hi
On Fri, 14 Mar 2014 11:18:48 +0800
Quanxian Wang quanxian.w...@intel.com wrote:
Objective:
With discussion in mail list, currently we have an agreement. Randr
interfaces will not be exposed public.
The objective will be only for testing and configuration. Thanks Pq, Jason,
Jasper,
:20 PM
To: Wang, Quanxian
Cc: wayland-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: weston: weston randr protocol for testing and configuration
Hi
On Fri, 14 Mar 2014 11:18:48 +0800
Quanxian Wang quanxian.w...@intel.com wrote:
Objective:
With discussion in mail list, currently we have an agreement
Objective:
With discussion in mail list, currently we have an agreement. Randr interfaces
will not be exposed public.
The objective will be only for testing and configuration. Thanks Pq, Jason,
Jasper, Hardening, and other's comment.
Before sending the email, the function list below is
15 matches
Mail list logo
