Re: [PATCHv2] Add name event to xdg-output

On Tue, 10 Apr 2018 10:27:40 -0400 Drew DeVault wrote: > Will it address your concerns if I: > > 1. Add a statement clarifying that the names are unique across all >living wl_outputs and may be reused if the corresponding wl_output >global is removed > 2. Add a statement

Re: [PATCHv2] Add name event to xdg-output

On 2018-04-10 5:09 PM, Pekka Paalanen wrote: > How do you define "one wl_output"? > > Do you mean it is the wl_output as identified by its global name (int), > and gets destroyed when the wl_registry sends the remove event? Yes, I mean one wl_output as in one global on the registry. >

Re: [PATCHv2] Add name event to xdg-output

On Tue, 10 Apr 2018 08:30:28 -0400 Drew DeVault wrote: > On 2018-04-10 12:20 PM, Pekka Paalanen wrote: > > Oh yes, that's a good point. This is actually a good reason to repeat > > the question: > > > > Does the name identify the connector or the monitor? > > I suppose I

Re: [PATCHv2] Add name event to xdg-output

On 2018-04-10 12:20 PM, Pekka Paalanen wrote: > Oh yes, that's a good point. This is actually a good reason to repeat > the question: > > Does the name identify the connector or the monitor? I suppose I should repeat the answer, too: one xdg_output maps to one wl_output and has a unique name.

Re: [PATCHv2] Add name event to xdg-output

On Mon, 09 Apr 2018 16:00:35 +0200 Philipp Kerling wrote: > Hey, > > I'll just reiterate one point from the prior discussion. > > > On Mon, 9 Apr 2018 08:13:15 -0400 > > Drew DeVault wrote: > > > > > Good feedback. > > > > > > On 2018-04-09 11:09 AM,

Re: [PATCHv2] Add name event to xdg-output

Hey, I'll just reiterate one point from the prior discussion. > On Mon, 9 Apr 2018 08:13:15 -0400 > Drew DeVault wrote: > > > Good feedback. > > > > On 2018-04-09 11:09 AM, Pekka Paalanen wrote: > > > Does this name correspond to the physical connector or to the > > > specific

Re: [PATCHv2] Add name event to xdg-output

On Mon, 9 Apr 2018 08:13:15 -0400 Drew DeVault wrote: > Good feedback. > > On 2018-04-09 11:09 AM, Pekka Paalanen wrote: > > Does this name correspond to the physical connector or to the specific > > monitor connected? Or some abstract "output" concept, see the next > >

Re: [PATCHv2] Add name event to xdg-output

Good feedback. On 2018-04-09 11:09 AM, Pekka Paalanen wrote: > Does this name correspond to the physical connector or to the specific > monitor connected? Or some abstract "output" concept, see the next > paragraph about clone mode. Doesn't matter, whatever the compositor wants. Should be unique

Re: [PATCHv2] Add name event to xdg-output

On Sun, 8 Apr 2018 10:25:21 -0400 Drew DeVault wrote: > Signed-off-by: Drew DeVault > Reviewed-by: Simon Ser > --- > Thanks Daniel for pointing out my silly mistakes > > unstable/xdg-output/xdg-output-unstable-v1.xml | 14 +- >