On 2018-04-08 3:22 PM, Daniel Stone wrote:
> A name event would be great, but this is missing a string param to
> carry the actual name.
Whoops!
> In order to not breaking existing clients, it also needs to:
> - come after the 'done' event so we don't renumber events
> - bump the xdg_output
Hi all,
On 7 April 2018 at 19:01, Drew DeVault wrote:
> +
> +
> +Many compositors will assign names to their outputs, show them to the
> user,
> +allow them to be configured by name, etc. The client may wish to know
> this
> +name as well to offer the user similar behavior
