In places where I came from, Wall Street, CVS/pharmacy, GE, GM, and rest of 1000 big
plus many tens of thousands smaller with exception of majority of ISPs and some
posters on this list, the deployment platform of choice is Java based. In critical
applications almost without exceptions the Java
Peter:
Whoa there!!
Never meant to get anybody's back up, it's just that in my experience I've
never seen or needed to touch Java and as a result never bothered to dig too
deep.
Now, as I don't work with, for in near Wall Street and the other examples
you give, I was not aware of their
Ross,
No fault on your part, Peter only pops up once or twice a month to start flame wars
and brag profusely about skills we mortals can't conceive...
flame type=non-contributor bashing
You know, I have never seen a URL in one of his sigs or any other supporting evidence
that he actually
Mark,
Were they looking for 'classic' asp or asp.net? Both can run on Apache/*nix
boxes. For
'classic' look at ChiliSoft (oops just went to get a url and discovered that
Sun has purchased it and it is now call Sun ONE Active Server Pages but is
still found at www.chilisoft.com}.
Another option
Peter,
I don't think anyone has disputed that in the large mainframe corporate
world Java is used extensively. That's the place it has found a home.
Most of the people on this list however don't work in that world or if they
do they work in a limited section of it related to the internet. There
Well, most of his points are valid...just his method of delivery is a
bit off. I noticed a couple of people on this list talking about how
Java was dead, or how it was useless. Those people are either
mis-informed, or M$ sheep. While I will agree that Java has no place on
HTLM pages (to
Java seems dead in the water as far as web (it's an overkill) and
application (it's too slow) are concerned. However, should expect Java
applications and games on mobile phones to do rather well.
-Original Message-
From: John Nichel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 27 December 2002
I use Java, primarily for graphics though, don't know if that's good
or bad. About two years ago, Sun's statements predicted that JSP
would become more useful than using CGI/PERL. I like it better than
C, C++. Java works just as well, but much easier to work with.
Jan
JDVisions
Why I believe
I have been coding valid web pages for around a year now and typically display links
(or the wonderful w3c graphics ;) to the validator on my personal sites, but am
hesitant to do so on business sites. Currently, I am working on a site that has valid
xhtml strict and valid css and I would
david, what a wonderful summary
very clearly explained
rudy
The WDVL Discussion List from WDVL.COM
To Join wdvltalk, Send An Email To: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Send Your Posts To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To change subscription settings to the wdvltalk digest version:
Personally I don't think the image/link for validation belongs on a
commercial site. If you want to 'brag' about it put someplace like the
accessibility policy. Include that it is Section 509 and/or WAG validated as
well which is more important to clients, especially those that deal with
Oops, I meant Section 508 or whatever is its accessibility equivalent if you
are outside the U.S.
Cheryl D. Wise
WiserWays
Office: 713.353.0139
Mobile: 713.412.0406
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Cheryl D. Wise
Personally I don't think the image/link for validation belongs
12 matches
Mail list logo
