David,
What is the code you're using?
Jan
David Blakey wrote:
A few months ago, one of my clients put up a new site with the email
addresses obfuscated by JavaScript, and with a set of new email
addresses. Although they continue to get spam to their old email
addresses, the new ones have had v
Jan
I use popfile which filters spam out pretty well and is easy to set up. I'm
using it with Debian but there is a M$ version.
On websites I use php mail forms.
Julian
- Original Message -
From: "Jan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, 17 January 2004 9:34
Subj
Rudy
Thanks for the info. Surprisingly, I am not receiving spam at my
[EMAIL PROTECTED], it's my [EMAIL PROTECTED] that has the spam
problem. I know that my isp supposedly has a spam block option, but
since I tried it and it didn't work well. I think I need to learn more
about the spam blocker
A few months ago, one of my clients put up a new site with the email
addresses obfuscated by JavaScript, and with a set of new email
addresses. Although they continue to get spam to their old email
addresses, the new ones have had very little spam.
So it does work. Incidentally, the developer
> Do you think you are getting spam from your way of
> displaying your email address?
no
i do get occasional spam, as someone pointed out, addressed to "sales" and
"info" and "webmaster" -- these come from people scraping the whois
listings, but this is pretty rare, ever since netsol implemented
Thanks for the info on turning off javascript in my browser. I
absolutely forgot about the scripts/plugins section. This will help me
to view my own web pages.
Jan
rudy wrote:
I don't know how to turn off JS in my Mozilla browser
Edit > Preferences
click on the "plus sign" beside Advanced
rudy wrote:
if javascript is disabled, they get what's in the NOSCRIPT tag --
Email: rudy at r937.com.
Replies within 24 hours.
Ok, yes you are right, if Javascript is turned off, the noscript info
will show.
Do you think you are getting spam from your way of displaying your email
address? T
> I don't know how to turn off JS in my Mozilla browser
Edit > Preferences
click on the "plus sign" beside Advanced in the left pane
click on Scripts & Plugins
uncheck the checkbox which enables javascript for navigator
ta da
thanks for making me walk through that
i need to tweak the text
> Rudy, if your code depends on JS and visitors have JS disabled,
> how are they going to see and use the email address?
perhaps our emails got crossed
if javascript is disabled, they get what's in the NOSCRIPT tag --
Email: rudy at r937.com.
Replies within 24 hours.
The WDVL Discuss
BJ,
I went to Rudy's contact.cfm page and viewed the source code of the
page, I didn't view the page in php. The question I just sent to Rudy is
regarding that he uses a JS code to obfuscate. I don't know how to turn
off JS in my Mozilla browser, so I cannot view that page with JS turned
off to
> mailto:visions@jd;
> visions.com">
> visions@jdv
> isions.com
>
> The code shows my email address as: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
i cannot show you one, i cannot name one, and it is only hearsay, but i've
heard that there *are* spambots that can read that
rudy
The WDVL Discussion List from WDVL
> Are you saying that your code can be read by visitors not using
> javascript, and if so, are you saying that spambots cannot pick up your
> email address by that code?
look carefully
i am using the standard that has been around ever since javascript was
invented -- the NOSCRIPT tag
yes, spambo
rudy wrote:
Rudy, I might have been mistaken about the code being ASCII,
which code?
The code that the email cloaker that was mentioned on this list and the
one that I use. I believe it uses Javascript to create the code but the
generated code is numbers.
For example, this following emailcloaki
- Original Message -
From: "Jan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> do you guarantee that the code you spoke of earlier
> won't be able to be read by the spambots?
I tried :o)
opening his page with php and reading the code, or doing a View Source, you
just get the call to the JS function where the li
> Rudy, I might have been mistaken about the code being ASCII,
which code?
i did not look at internet-marketing-forum.com because it's for members only
> ... because it has numbers just like what you have
> on your contact.cfm page.
on my contact page, i have something completely different
it
Rudy,
Rudy, I might have been mistaken about the code being ASCII, because it
has numbers just like what you have on your contact.cfm page. BTW,
do you guarantee that the code you spoke of earlier won't be able to be
read by the spambots?
Jan
rudy wrote:
spambots do know how to read ascii codes
> ... the code is in ASCII form that you put on your html pages,
> so even if visitors have their javascript turned off, ...
spambots do know how to read ascii codes
i would not consider this method safe at all
granted, not all spambots, i'm sure, but some of them...
you've locked the front doo
Bj,
Also, I forgot to mention that even though the email cloaker html page I
sent you uses javascript to create the cloaking code, the code is in
ASCII form that you put on your html pages, so even if visitors have
their javascript turned off, the code still works.
Jan
Bj wrote:
Thank you for
Hi Will
DSL, WinXP Pro, Moz.1.5, 800x600 and 1024x768
Using Moz, I'm not getting a horizontal scrollbar at 800x600 or
1024x768, however at both resolutions, Mozilla shows an additional area
on the top.
Using IE 6.0, there is a horizontal scrollbar at both 800x600 and
1024x768, but IE 6.0 does n
Will
Not had chance to look properly but I did notice this:
You open up the master table at 100% width and within your very first table
row you have cells with widths specified as 169, 100%, 247 and 145
respectively. This adds up to over 100% your page width which I believe is
what is causing you
> I looked at the source, and I looked at some of the CSS,
> and I can't see it.
> Sorry Will.
me too
looked long and hard, no luck
thought it was the DIVs in the TD called "main", but it isn't
noticed you have a misplaced LINK tag just ahead of the H1 in the page that
does work, not that this
Will, off-list I sent you a screen print where I used a "show blocks"
bookmarklet
(from http://www.squarefree.com/bookmarklets/webdevel.html) to display all
the blocks on your site. It appears that in the top row there's a big block
with just a background image (a td cell?) that is pushing ev
> this page was his first attempt at a tableless css-only layout, and
> on that basis, i think it's great
It is?!?! I thought Matt had been XHTML+CSS for ages now!
I stand corrected and applaud Matt for getting his first CSS only version
better than anything I churned out for my first 3 months!
looks great to me by Gosh! 1025 screen however ...
BTW would you like to share the css code for just the links boxes thing?
TIA!
Gerrie
www.osthammar.info
can I get the css code
- Original Message -
From: "William Stewart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, J
Bj,
Hi, this was on the list before. Although it's created using Javascript,
it is an effective email cloaking code:
http://www.internet-marketing-forum.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=2316
hth,
Jan
Bj wrote:
Bored with the spam that comes from having a mailto: link on a Web page, I
was toying with
- Original Message -
From: "Tucson-WebDesign - Al Guevara"
> WHAT ARE ALL THE PICS TO THE RIGHT?
They're supposed to there, be down the right hand side of the page (see the
second page link) but Will's problem is why there's all that extra white
space pushing them off the screen.
I loo
WHAT ARE ALL THE PICS TO THE RIGHT?
At 1/17/2004 10:33 AM, you wrote:
Hi everyone,
When you can, take a look at:
http://www.wstewart.com/designs/wvfamily/index.php
For some reason, the page stretches past the browser edge in 800x600 and
in 1024x768. I have looked at the code and can't find wh
> Having looked at it hard now (in case I missed a serious revision
> or I'm just wrong) I guess what I'm thinking is that the layout
> looks a tad haphazrd -
master of the universe, perhaps you did not realize, this page was his first
attempt at a tableless css-only layout, and on that basis, i t
In response to Amanda and a pre-emptive apology to Matt:
We've all got our own tastes and I'm not saying the absense of fancy
graphics or intricate design makes the site in anyway a lesser piece of
development, so sorry if I gave that impression.
Having looked at it hard now (in case I missed a s
Hi everyone,
When you can, take a look at:
http://www.wstewart.com/designs/wvfamily/index.php
For some reason, the page stretches past the browser edge in 800x600 and
in 1024x768. I have looked at the code and can't find what is wrong.
If you check out:
http://www.wstewart.com/designs/wvfamil
Something's just wrong. Can't quite put my finger on it, but it's
just...well...wrong. Looks bland, rushed and maybe even amateurish. I think
you might need to rip it all out and start again.
There's no arguing with taste, of course, but I have to say it didn't
strike me that way ... I can see ho
I'm really not sure about this one Matt...
Something's just wrong. Can't quite put my finger on it, but it's
just...well...wrong. Looks bland, rushed and maybe even amateurish. I think
you might need to rip it all out and start again.
If your client it happy with it then I don't think you're pain
I think you need to dump it and start all over ...
Subject: [wdvltalk] [SCR] http://www.interactwiththe.net/ict/
The WDVL Discussion List from WDVL.COM
To Join wdvltalk, Send An Email To: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Send Your Posts To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To set a persona
BJ,
You could use this: http://www.hiveware.com however, found out that people
that don't have js enabled will not be able to use it. So, instead many
have resorted to things like these little freebie programs offer:
http://www.codefoot.com/software/ecloaker/index.html
http://www.damselsoft.
34 matches
Mail list logo
