I think you need to dump it and start all over ...
Subject: [wdvltalk] [SCR] http://www.interactwiththe.net/ict/
The WDVL Discussion List from WDVL.COM
To Join wdvltalk, Send An Email To: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Send Your Posts To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To set a
I'm really not sure about this one Matt...
Something's just wrong. Can't quite put my finger on it, but it's
just...well...wrong. Looks bland, rushed and maybe even amateurish. I think
you might need to rip it all out and start again.
If your client it happy with it then I don't think you're
Something's just wrong. Can't quite put my finger on it, but it's
just...well...wrong. Looks bland, rushed and maybe even amateurish. I think
you might need to rip it all out and start again.
There's no arguing with taste, of course, but I have to say it didn't
strike me that way ... I can see
In response to Amanda and a pre-emptive apology to Matt:
We've all got our own tastes and I'm not saying the absense of fancy
graphics or intricate design makes the site in anyway a lesser piece of
development, so sorry if I gave that impression.
Having looked at it hard now (in case I missed a
Having looked at it hard now (in case I missed a serious revision
or I'm just wrong) I guess what I'm thinking is that the layout
looks a tad haphazrd -
master of the universe, perhaps you did not realize, this page was his first
attempt at a tableless css-only layout, and on that basis, i
this page was his first attempt at a tableless css-only layout, and
on that basis, i think it's great
It is?!?! I thought Matt had been XHTML+CSS for ages now!
I stand corrected and applaud Matt for getting his first CSS only version
better than anything I churned out for my first 3 months!
Do you have the auto image resize turned on? I couldn't get it that small
because of the large bubble image at the top?
Cheryl D. Wise
Certified Professional Web Developer
MS-MVP-FrontPage
www.wiserways.com
mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
713.353.0139 Office
-Original Message-
From: Stephen
--- Cheryl D. Wise wrote: ---
: Do you have the auto image resize turned on? I couldn't get it
: that small because of the large bubble image at the top?
Not before there was scroll, before the floats fished out.
-Stephen
http://www.mechavox.com/
The WDVL
you've been great so far, please can you take another look at
http://www.interactwiththe.net/ict/
The menu should now be visible in all browsers and it should (fingers
crossed) scale ok to lower resolutions
matt, you've got to stop talking about resolutions, and start talking about
browser
--- Matthew Macdonald-Wallace wrote: ---
: All,
:
: you've been great so far, please can you take another look at
: http://www.interactwiththe.net/ict/
:
: The menu should now be visible in all browsers and it should
: (fingers crossed) scale ok to lower resolutions
On Wed, 2004-01-14 at 16:02, rudy wrote:
you've been great so far, please can you take another look at
http://www.interactwiththe.net/ict/
The menu should now be visible in all browsers and it should (fingers
crossed) scale ok to lower resolutions
matt, you've got to stop talking
Stephen,
On Wed, 2004-01-14 at 16:06, Stephen Caudill wrote:
--- Matthew Macdonald-Wallace wrote: ---
: All,
:
: you've been great so far, please can you take another look at
: http://www.interactwiththe.net/ict/
:
: The menu should now be visible in all
--- Matthew Macdonald-Wallace wrote: ---
: Nice idea, I'm just not sure how to do it! :)
I empathize. The gazingus scripts are totally object oriented and
can be real mind blowsers. I sat around for two days with two
other developers just trying to wrap our heads
liquid design has nothing to do with resolutions, and everything
to do with how wide the user lets the available browser window be
OK, that's cool, I'll get in into my head now! :)
see below
About Us wraps
Ok, I haven't got a clue about how to solve this. any ideas?
Aboutnbsp;Us
This shows up in IE, but not Mozilla:
Brilliant at keeping an audience alive
John Peel - Board Member
South East England
Development Agency
They take a problem and make the solution happen
Manny Gatt - Chief Executive
Business Link Nottingham
Erik
-Original Message-
From: Matthew
- Original Message -
From: Matthew Macdonald-Wallace
Please take a look at http://www.interactwiththe.net/ict/ and let me
know what you think.
I'm using IE6 SP1 on Win98 and I only see a menu with Home, About Us,
Services and Clients. And although the source says there is a sub menu
--- Matthew Macdonald-Wallace wrote: ---
: All,
:
: Please take a look at http://www.interactwiththe.net/ict/ and let
: me know what you think.
:
: There seems to be a weird thing in IE on the work computer where
: Government Bids doesn't show up properly.
:
: Can
Works well in all the browsers I tested with IE 6, Opera 7.21, Mozilla, NN
4.x. Note that in NN 4.x resizing is slow but does eventually happen. If you
have many NN 4.x visitor, especially those with earlier versions you might
want to put in the Netscape resize fix.
While I like simple, it might
Drew,
Ta for having a look,
On Thu, 2004-01-08 at 15:59, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matt, I still see the xml prolog. You need to remove that since it throws
ie6 into quirks mode. Put the charset in a meta tag.
Won't this invalidate the xhtml?
No scroll on ie6, win2k server until you get
No, it isn't necessary not even for xhtml strict as long as you have the
character info in a meta tag as Drew says. It is only necessary if it is
true xml.
Here's a list of browsers that have problems with the xml prolog
http://www.webstandards.org/learn/reference/prolog_problems.html
Zeldman
Removing the prolog won't invalidate xhtml. Your page will likely be
served as text/html and not application/xhtml+xml. So arguably it will
actually improve the page.
The overflow goes on the container not the img tag. Not in the office so I
can't give you the url to look at but its hebig's url.
Matt,
At 1024 resolution it looks great, a lot cleaner than the previous version.
One concern might be that you are losing a lot of space at the top of the
screen with the corporate identity stuff. It takes up about a third on 800
by 600 and you also have a vertical scroll, but I assume that's
This is the first attempt at the new site:
http://www.interactwiththe.net/ict/mainPage.png
it is nice and simple (which is *very* important in my book)
and rather easy to make liquid ;o)
the previous version did have a bunch of icons in the main body area, are
you planning to do away with
On Wed, 2004-01-07 at 16:04, rudy wrote:
This is the first attempt at the new site:
http://www.interactwiththe.net/ict/mainPage.png
it is nice and simple (which is *very* important in my book)
and rather easy to make liquid ;o)
the previous version did have a bunch of icons in the
At 08:18 AM 1/7/2004, Matt wrote:
I'm currently writing the CSS for the xhtml to display it properly, as a
liquid layout. (/me doesn't do tables anymore!)
Since the page is just an png image file, not an html, I have no way to
review your code (Nice-view page though). But I noticed that you
KoaFar,
On Wed, 2004-01-07 at 18:47, K.F. Wu wrote:
At 08:18 AM 1/7/2004, Matt wrote:
I'm currently writing the CSS for the xhtml to display it properly, as a
liquid layout. (/me doesn't do tables anymore!)
Since the page is just an png image file, not an html, I have no way to
review
26 matches
Mail list logo
