Howard and ravenstudio2, thanks for your comments. I've used STS before
as collaboration software and was pretty happy with it in that mode, but
I agree that it just doesn't seem suited for informational sites.
Sean, I know it's expensive and overkill. :-) Since I'm growing wiser
with age, I'm
Tim
We are currently experimenting with a hosted version of Sharepoint. It's
working very well for us, but it's not replacing anything that exists. The
purpose of the site is wholly collaboration-calendaring, issue lists, shared
documents and discussions.
What's working best for us? There is
Hi Tim,
I have a buddy whose business right now is instructional classes in
Sharepoint. He may be able to answer some of your questions. Email me
off list if you are interested in his contact info.
HTH,
Will Stewart
-Original Message-
From: Furry, Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
Sharepoint 2003 is expensive, not only the app, but the system requirements.
It needs it's own server - cannot be on the same server as Exchange, for
example.
Good for large organisations with a gazillion documents, particularly when
intranet/internet/extranet are all mixed into the portal. For
