On Monday 23 January 2006 22:15, Clark C. Evans wrote:
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 04:15:06PM -0500, Phillip J. Eby wrote:
| At 03:36 PM 1/23/2006 -0500, Stephan Richter wrote:
| Specify a new environment variable called 'wsgi.user' (or something
| similar) that is a mutable and can be written
At 10:15 PM 1/23/2006 -0500, Clark C. Evans wrote:
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 04:15:06PM -0500, Phillip J. Eby wrote:
| At 03:36 PM 1/23/2006 -0500, Stephan Richter wrote:
| Specify a new environment variable called 'wsgi.user' (or something
| similar) that is a mutable and can be written several
Phillip J. Eby wrote:
...
I'm pointing out that the use case under consideration isn't specific
*enough* yet. Do people's log files support unicode? Do the
authentication systems? This hasn't been made clear, and it should be.
I agree. I think we should be guided by the common log file
At 10:30 PM 1/23/2006 -0500, Clark C. Evans wrote:
Suggested Wording:
A WSGI Middleware component (that is, one that receives a
request and forwards it on to another component) must forward
on the *exact* same ``environ`` dict that it received.
-1. This invalidates current WSGI
On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 11:33:56AM -0500, Phillip J. Eby wrote:
| I think this is way too specific; it doesn't address the general
| problem: how do you pass information back up the middleware stack.
| There is no general problem which anyone is trying to solve. The use
| case requested by
At 12:35 PM 1/24/2006 -0500, Michal Wallace wrote:
Maybe I just don't understand why this is
important. Can someone (Jim) explain why this
is a requirement in the first place?
I'd like to know too, although the obvious argument is backward
compatibility for people accustomed to ZServer as Zope
On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 05:34:19PM -0500, Phillip J. Eby wrote:
| By turning that narrowly-stated issue into a general problem, you're
| dissolving three dimensions of specificity at once: i.e., you're turning
| the problem into essentially communicating something about anything to
| anybody,
At 09:42 PM 1/24/2006 -0500, Clark C. Evans wrote:
Nice sermon; now can we get back to the issue being discussed without
being argumentative and santimonious?
I didn't notice anyone being either of those. As for the sermon, however,
I'm glad you enjoyed it. :)
Another use case for passing
On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 12:41:01AM -0500, Michal Wallace wrote:
| Unfortunately, if you require it to be the exact same
| *object* then you're making the requirement that
| everything in the stack happens in the same process,
| on the same machine.
Correct. Phillip's extension APIs approach
