Ian Bicking ha scritto:
> Manlio Perillo wrote:
>> The WSGI spec requires the response headers and sequence items to be,
>> respectively, List of Tuples and Strings.
>>
>> However only for the response headers it explicitly requires them to
>> be a Python List, i.e type(response_headers) is ListT
Manlio Perillo wrote:
> The WSGI spec requires the response headers and sequence items to be,
> respectively, List of Tuples and Strings.
>
> However only for the response headers it explicitly requires them to be
> a Python List, i.e type(response_headers) is ListType.
>
> What about the other
The WSGI spec requires the response headers and sequence items to be,
respectively, List of Tuples and Strings.
However only for the response headers it explicitly requires them to be
a Python List, i.e type(response_headers) is ListType.
What about the other objects?
In the current implementa
Robert Brewer ha scritto:
> Manlio Perillo wrote:
>> Is a WSGI gateway allowed to ignore the Reason-Phrase part of the
>> status line returned by the WSGI application, and to use a server
>> defined phrase?
>
> I would be sad if a WSGI gateway did that to me.
> Why deny a web
> application develo
Manlio Perillo wrote:
> Is a WSGI gateway allowed to ignore the Reason-Phrase part of the
> status line returned by the WSGI application, and to use a server
> defined phrase?
I would be sad if a WSGI gateway did that to me. Why deny a web
application developer the right to control that part of th
Is a WSGI gateway allowed to ignore the Reason-Phrase part of the status
line returned by the WSGI application, and to use a server defined phrase?
Thanks and regards Manlio Perillo
___
Web-SIG mailing list
Web-SIG@python.org
Web SIG: http://www.pyth
