Re: [Web-SIG] WebOb

2007-10-22 Thread William Dode
Hi, Since the announce of ian about webob, i did two things with it. First i include it in my personal web framework, it was very easy, i had just to remove all my crappy equivalent functions. It make my framework a little bit more clean and i can inherit new features. Second, most important,

Re: [Web-SIG] WebOb

2007-10-22 Thread Manlio Perillo
William Dode ha scritto: Hi, Since the announce of ian about webob, i did two things with it. First i include it in my personal web framework, it was very easy, i had just to remove all my crappy equivalent functions. It make my framework a little bit more clean and i can inherit new

Re: [Web-SIG] WebOb

2007-10-22 Thread Fred Drake
On 10/22/07, William Dode [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So, don't you think web-sig should officialy support such library ? Include it in the lib stantard or in a wsgiorg library ? I'm strongly against adding more non-Python-runtime batteries to the standard library. The plethora of packages

Re: [Web-SIG] WebOb

2007-10-22 Thread Tres Seaver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Guido van Rossum wrote: Cool. I already heard in the grapevibe about webob.py. Anyway, I'd be interested in feedback. We've talked a little about a shared request object -- only a little, and I don't know if it is really a realistic goal to

Re: [Web-SIG] WebOb

2007-10-22 Thread Ian Bicking
Guido van Rossum wrote: Anyway, I'd be interested in feedback. We've talked a little about a shared request object -- only a little, and I don't know if it is really a realistic goal to even try. But I think this request object is a considerably higher quality than any other request objects

Re: [Web-SIG] WebOb

2007-10-22 Thread Guido van Rossum
2007/10/22, Ian Bicking [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I briefly looked at the tutorial and was put off a little by the interactive prompt style of the examples; that seems so unrealistic that I wonder if it wouldn't be better to just say put this in a file and run it like this? The side effect of

Re: [Web-SIG] WebOb

2007-10-22 Thread Ian Bicking
Adam Atlas wrote: On 22 Oct 2007, at 12:09, William Dode wrote: So, don't you think web-sig should officialy support such library ? Include it in the lib stantard or in a wsgiorg library ? I don't really like the idea of having something like this be part of the standard library; it's

[Web-SIG] Gluon again

2007-10-22 Thread Massimo Di Pierro
I posted a Gluon tutorial here http://mdp.cti.depaul.edu/examples/static/cookbook.pdf it shows step by step how to build a web app to store recipes and group them by category. It is a first draft so there are may be some english some typos. Sorry. Massimo P.S. I'll never stress it

Re: [Web-SIG] Gluon again

2007-10-22 Thread Joshua Simpson
On 10/22/07, Massimo Di Pierro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: it shows step by step how to build a web app to store recipes and group them by category. It is a first draft so there are may be some english some typos. Sorry. I'm going to check this out. Are you from a primarily C background? Your

Re: [Web-SIG] WebOb

2007-10-22 Thread Ian Bicking
Guido van Rossum wrote: 2007/10/22, Ian Bicking [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I briefly looked at the tutorial and was put off a little by the interactive prompt style of the examples; that seems so unrealistic that I wonder if it wouldn't be better to just say put this in a file and run it like this?