Okay, thanks for all that. Now for next question.
So far we haven't addressed how wsgi.file_wrapper should work for
Python 3.0. Already in existing versions of Python usage of
wsgi.file_wrapper may be unclear in that there are portability
concerns between UNIX and Windows over fact that FILE objec
At 11:41 AM 3/25/2008 -0500, Ian Bicking wrote:
>Phillip J. Eby wrote:
>>At 11:04 AM 3/25/2008 -0500, Ian Bicking wrote:
>>>Phillip J. Eby wrote:
It says that in versions of Python where 'str is unicode' (i.e.
Jython, IronPython, and Python 3000), then the specification
should be read
Graham Dumpleton wrote:
> 3. When running under Python 3, servers MUST provide CGI HTTP
> variables as strings, decoded from the headers using HTTP standard
> encodings (i.e. latin-1 + RFC 2047)
>
> Can someone give a practical example of where RFC 2047 fits into this
> and how one is meant to han
Phillip J. Eby wrote:
> At 11:04 AM 3/25/2008 -0500, Ian Bicking wrote:
>> Phillip J. Eby wrote:
>>> It says that in versions of Python where 'str is unicode' (i.e.
>>> Jython, IronPython, and Python 3000), then the specification should
>>> be read to define "string" as a unicode string whose cha
At 11:04 AM 3/25/2008 -0500, Ian Bicking wrote:
>Phillip J. Eby wrote:
>>It says that in versions of Python where 'str is unicode' (i.e.
>>Jython, IronPython, and Python 3000), then the specification should
>>be read to define "string" as a unicode string whose characters can
>>be expressed in l
Phillip J. Eby wrote:
> At 04:54 PM 3/25/2008 +1100, Graham Dumpleton wrote:
>> Why are servers and gateways being made to accept strings when the
>> preference is for applications to produce bytes for both? Is this
>> acknowledgment that getting people to convert WSGI applications to
>> produce by
At 04:54 PM 3/25/2008 +1100, Graham Dumpleton wrote:
>Why are servers and gateways being made to accept strings when the
>preference is for applications to produce bytes for both? Is this
>acknowledgment that getting people to convert WSGI applications to
>produce bytes may be a problem?
Yep.
>Th
