Re: [Web-SIG] Move to bless Graham's WSGI 1.1 as official spec

2009-11-28 Thread Graham Dumpleton
2009/11/29 James Y Knight : > On Nov 28, 2009, at 10:44 PM, Graham Dumpleton wrote: >> Either way, since there seemed to be objections at some level on every >> point, and since I really really have no enthusiasm for this stuff any >> more or of fighting for any change, I retract my personal intere

Re: [Web-SIG] Move to bless Graham's WSGI 1.1 as official spec

2009-11-28 Thread James Y Knight
On Nov 28, 2009, at 10:44 PM, Graham Dumpleton wrote: > Either way, since there seemed to be objections at some level on every > point, and since I really really have no enthusiasm for this stuff any > more or of fighting for any change, I retract my personal interest in > having any of the amendme

Re: [Web-SIG] Move to bless Graham's WSGI 1.1 as official spec

2009-11-28 Thread Graham Dumpleton
2009/11/29 Graham Dumpleton : > After reading my prior blog posts where I explained my reasoning > behind the changes, I will acknowledge that I haven't explained some > stuff very well and people are failing to understand or getting wrong > idea about why something is being suggested. > > I still

Re: [Web-SIG] Move to bless Graham's WSGI 1.1 as official spec

2009-11-28 Thread Graham Dumpleton
After reading my prior blog posts where I explained my reasoning behind the changes, I will acknowledge that I haven't explained some stuff very well and people are failing to understand or getting wrong idea about why something is being suggested. I still believe there are though underlying probl

Re: [Web-SIG] http://wiki.python.org/moin/WebFrameworks

2009-11-28 Thread Ian Bicking
Personally, if the author/maintainer of any library claims it is maintained/up-to-date, I say trust them. Most people are pretty honest about the status of their projects. But it does require a positive response to really make this claim. On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 12:03 PM, Aaron Watters wrote:

Re: [Web-SIG] http://wiki.python.org/moin/WebFrameworks

2009-11-28 Thread exarkun
On 28 Nov, 08:03 pm, chr...@plope.com wrote: Well, that was my intention. I don't want to remove *actually* active or stable-and-still-used packages from the list. Maybe I should just dial back the date to the beginning of 2007 or something. Instead of trying to do this based on an arbitrary

Re: [Web-SIG] http://wiki.python.org/moin/WebFrameworks

2009-11-28 Thread Chris McDonough
Aaron Watters wrote: On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 1:02 PM, Chris McDonough wrote: http://wiki.python.org/moin/WebFrameworks seems to be the place where folks are registering their respective web frameworks. I'd like to move some of the frameworks which are currently in the various categories wh

Re: [Web-SIG] http://wiki.python.org/moin/WebFrameworks

2009-11-28 Thread Aaron Watters
> > On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 1:02 PM, Chris McDonough > wrote: > > http://wiki.python.org/moin/WebFrameworks > seems to be the place where folks > > are registering their respective web frameworks. > > > > I'd like to move some of the frameworks which are > currently in the various > > categories