On 12 April 2010 06:07, Manlio Perillo wrote:
> I'm not sure about the correct procedure to follow, I hope it is not a
> problem.
>
> I here propose the x-wsgiorg.suspend to be accepted as official WSGI
> extension, using the wsgiorg namespace.
>
> The extension is documented in doc/wsgiorg.suspen
P.J. Eby ha scritto:
> At 02:04 PM 4/10/2010 +0100, Chris Dent wrote:
>> I realize I'm able to build up a complete string or yield via a
>> generator, or a whole bunch of various ways to accomplish things
>> (which is part of why I like WSGI: that content is just an iterator,
>> that's a good thing
Gustavo Narea ha scritto:
> Hello,
>
> Maybe I'm missing something obvious, but if the gateway doesn't support
> applications that return write() callables, then it's not WSGI.
>
> A callable that raises an exception does not even count. It's obvious
> that they must not raise exceptions -- Then
I'm not sure about the correct procedure to follow, I hope it is not a
problem.
I here propose the x-wsgiorg.suspend to be accepted as official WSGI
extension, using the wsgiorg namespace.
The extension is documented in doc/wsgiorg.suspend.rst document in the
txwsgi source distribution, available
I'm pleased to announce txwsgi, version 0.1.
txwsgi is a fork of twisted.web.wsgi, that, unlike the original
implementation, executes the WSGI application in the main I/O thread.
txwsgi implements the proposed x-wsgiorg.suspend extension, that enables
support to asynchronous WSGI applications.
S
