Apologies for the crossposting.
Free half day conference in SF, still open speaking slots (all topics
considered). Please excuse the roughness of our web presence.
- Sign up at http://www.meetup.com/sfbay-pylons-proj/events/17306893/
- Read info and post suggestions and talk submissions at
On 2011-04-14 08:53:55 -0700, Randy Syring said:
Just wondering if Windows/IIS is being kept in mind as this discussion
is going on. I am having a hard time conceptualizing the things being
discussed, so can't really tell myself.
I'm trying pretty hard to ensure that non-compatible OS featur
I think there's a general concept we should have, which I'll call a "script"
-- but basically it's a script to run (__main__-style), a callable to call
(module:name), or a URL to fetch internally. I want to keep this distinct
from anything long-running, which is a much more complex deal. I think
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 2:53 AM, Graham Dumpleton <
graham.dumple...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 14 April 2011 16:57, Alice Bevan–McGregor wrote:
> >> 3. Define how to get the WSGI app. This is WSGI specific, but (1) is
> >> *not* WSGI specific (it's only Python specific, and would apply well to
> >>
On 04/14/2011 11:45 AM, Eric Larson wrote:
...regarding apache/nginx config if necessary, but basing that on the
expectation there is a single script is a better approach than presuming a
config can provide enough information to eventually create some script that
apache/nginx/etc. might need t
Hi,
On Apr 14, 2011, at 4:02 AM, Graham Dumpleton wrote:
> On 14 April 2011 18:22, Alice Bevan–McGregor wrote:
>> Howdy!
>>
>> I suspect you're thinking a little too low-level.
>
> Exactly, I am trying to walk before running. Things always fall down
> here because people try and take too lar
On 14 April 2011 18:22, Alice Bevan–McGregor wrote:
> Howdy!
>
> I suspect you're thinking a little too low-level.
Exactly, I am trying to walk before running. Things always fall down
here because people try and take too large a leap rather than an
incremental approach, solving one small problem
Howdy!
I suspect you're thinking a little too low-level.
On 2011-04-14 00:53:09 -0700, Graham Dumpleton said:
On 14 April 2011 16:57, Alice Bevan–McGregor
wrote:
3. Define how to get the WSGI app. This is WSGI specific, but (1) is
*not* WSGI specific (it's only Python specific, and would ap
Il giorno 14/apr/2011, alle ore 09.53, Graham Dumpleton ha scritto:
> On 14 April 2011 16:57, Alice Bevan–McGregor wrote:
>>> 3. Define how to get the WSGI app. This is WSGI specific, but (1) is
>>> *not* WSGI specific (it's only Python specific, and would apply well to
>>> other platforms)
>>
On 14 April 2011 16:57, Alice Bevan–McGregor wrote:
>> 3. Define how to get the WSGI app. This is WSGI specific, but (1) is
>> *not* WSGI specific (it's only Python specific, and would apply well to
>> other platforms)
>
> I could imagine there would be multiple "application types":
>
> :: WSGI a
10 matches
Mail list logo
