Re: [Web-SIG] WSGI Open Space @ PyCon.

On Sun, 29 Mar 2009 16:21:36 -0700, Robert Brewer wrote: We had a smaller third meeting and answered more issues. Hi all, First, thanks for writing up these reports. [snip] Asynchronous WSGI support - Mostly non-existent. Fix it? Fork it? Drop it? Glyph seemed to t

Re: [Web-SIG] python bug issue2464

On Wed, 13 Aug 2008 21:00:28 +0530, "O.R.Senthil Kumaran" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: * scriptor Jean-Paul Calderone, explico Some things: http://foo.com This is not a valid URL. The correct URL for the intended location here is: http://foo.com/ This is the root o

Re: [Web-SIG] python bug issue2464

On Wed, 13 Aug 2008 18:14:19 +0530, "O.R.Senthil Kumaran" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I am trying to write a fix for this bug http://bugs.python.org/issue2464 - urllib2 can't handle http://www.wikispaces.com What actually happening here is: 1) urllib2 tries to open http://www.wikispaces.com 2)

Re: [Web-SIG] Fwd: wsgiref.simple_server slow on slow network

On Tue, 22 Jul 2008 09:58:06 +0200, Tibor Arpas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I added the Content-Length and no difference. Important thing I noticed is that I get the same request/response rate with only ONE byte of content. So it looks like a constant delay of 3 seconds per request.. wsgiref see

Re: [Web-SIG] newbie help with httpsconnection

On Sat, 9 Feb 2008 23:56:00 -0800 (PST), Jeff Peery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Hello, > I'm stumped. I'm trying to run the following bit of code in a cgi script. > > httpServ = httplib.HTTPSConnection('https://secure.authorize.net') The first parameter to HTTPSConnection is supposed to be a

Re: [Web-SIG] WSGI and asyncronous applications support

On Tue, 18 Sep 2007 13:39:23 +0200, Manlio Perillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [snip] > >1) should be very simple to implement, and it is easy to understand how >to use it. > >As an example, we can use some API that calls a callback function when >the result is available: >conn.execute("SELECT * F

Re: [Web-SIG] WSGI -- usable for other protocols?

On Tue, 17 Oct 2006 18:19:10 PDT, Bill Janssen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> might I suggest you contribute >> to a project which sounds roughly equivalent to the one you're describing? >> >> http://divmod.org/trac/wiki/DivmodQuotient > >Just for fun, I grepped the sources for IMAP. No hits. Quit

Re: [Web-SIG] WSGI -- usable for other protocols?

On Tue, 17 Oct 2006 15:48:12 PDT, Bill Janssen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >I've been working on Python IMAP server that uses PyLucene for >indexing. It's mainly IMAP, but also speaks a bit of HTTP for an >administrative interface. Does it make any sense to wrap it with >WSGI? That is, does WSGI

Re: [Web-SIG] html dom like javascript ?

On Thu, 17 Aug 2006 10:10:47 -0400, seth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Is there a python library which is analogous to javascript for creating >html/xhtml documents? e.g.: > > hidden = document.createElement("input") > hidden.setAttribute("type", "hidden") > hidden.setAttribut

Re: [Web-SIG] WSGI in standard library

On Wed, 15 Feb 2006 00:50:11 -0500, "Clark C. Evans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 12:49:00PM -0800, Guido van Rossum wrote: > >| My gut feeling: Ignores many parts of the WSGI spec (sendfile, strict >| error checking), supports unnecessary stuff for stdlib, i.e. Continue >| s

Re: [Web-SIG] Simple CGI sessions

On Wed, 11 Jan 2006 15:53:23 +1300, Hadley Rich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Hi all, > >>From a quick browse through the archives I can see sessions are a common >subject here. Hopefully you're all not to sick of it to comment. > >I've been wanting to use python for a web project I'm doing at the mo