[Alan Kennedy]
Looking at this in an MVC context ...
[Phillip J. Eby]
As soon as you start talking about what templates should or should not
do (as opposed to what they *already* do), you've stopped writing an
inclusive spec and have wandered off into evangelizing a particular
I'm not sure what you're talking about here. Are you talking about
WSGI? Or the templating effort? I've tuned out the templating discussion.
I think you and others did a fantastic job with WSGI. (Based on my
experience I do think it needs more work in the future, but that's
beside the point.)
At 09:08 AM 2/7/2006 -0500, Jim Fulton wrote:
I'm not sure what you're talking about here. Are you talking about
WSGI? Or the templating effort? I've tuned out the templating discussion.
Just the templating effort, and that only for the time being. I just don't
feel I have enough time to
On Tuesday 07 February 2006 10:20, Phillip J. Eby wrote:
Despite some skepticism about the templating
effort, I certainly planned to evaluate it when it settled down.
I'm not complaining about you personally tuning out; it's just that I ended
up being a sole advocate for stuff I thought Zope
Phillip J. Eby wrote:
Despite some skepticism about the templating
effort, I certainly planned to evaluate it when it settled down.
I'm not complaining about you personally tuning out; it's just that I ended
up being a sole advocate for stuff I thought Zope would need in order to
utilize
At 11:12 AM 2/7/2006 -0600, Ian Bicking wrote:
Maybe the reason those voices are missing -- I now realize -- is that
there aren't many active page frameworks left.
All the more reason to encourage an approach that allows migrating existing
code written using those systems! :)
I think it's
On Tue, 07 Feb 2006 11:12:04 -0600, Ian Bicking [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
Maybe the reason those voices are missing -- I now realize -- is that
there aren't many active page frameworks left. Spyce was, but since
then I believe a more traditional controller-driven API has been added
Yes, but
On Tue, Feb 07, 2006 at 11:12:04AM -0600, Ian Bicking wrote:
Maybe the reason those voices are missing -- I now realize -- is that
there aren't many active page frameworks left.
Yup. SkunkWeb too, which like Myghty also started out as a port of
Mason, now has a controller framework, with
At 08:02 PM 2/5/2006 +, Alan Kennedy wrote:
Looking at this in an MVC context, the application is responsible for
populating the Model (user namespace), and selecting which View
(template-media-type) is suitable for return to the user. Templates
should not vary media types. HTTP headers do
