At 11:29 AM 3/22/2007 +, Alan Kennedy wrote:
Strictly speaking, WSGI requires python 2.2,
because of iterators.
Actually, it doesn't. The pre-2.2 iterator protocol is to be used in such
cases:
http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0333/#supporting-older-2-2-versions-of-python
Graham Dumpleton wrote:
When one is using CGI as a means of implementing a WSGI application,
although one would return content through the iterable returned from
the application or by calling write() method returned from
start_response(), one could actually write to sys.stdout directly as
At 04:52 PM 3/22/2007 +, Alan Kennedy wrote:
But if the users want their modern python applications to be
portable everywhere on WSGI, e.g. returning (iterable) files as ouput,
Actually, returning a file as output is a horrible idea, since it will
massively reduce throughput, due to
Thanks for all the input, gives me some things to think about.
On 23/03/07, Ian Bicking [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Graham Dumpleton wrote:
In the case of sys.stdout, do people see it as being at least good
practice, if not required by specification, that the WSGI adapter
should ensure that
When one is using CGI as a means of implementing a WSGI application,
although one would return content through the iterable returned from
the application or by calling write() method returned from
start_response(), one could actually write to sys.stdout directly as
well since that is where the
