Re: [Web-SIG] Nodejs cluster

2014-09-25 Thread Robert Collins
On 19 March 2014 22:02, Tobias Oberstein tobias.oberst...@tavendo.de wrote: We are working on a system (on top of Autobahn) which provides builtin scale-up (multi-core) and scale-out (multi-node) capabilities: https://github.com/crossbario/crossbar This is work in progress and relies on

Re: [Web-SIG] Nodejs cluster

2014-09-15 Thread Tobias Oberstein
 If you crosslink the Flask app object and the WebSocket factory with each other you can shuffle data in both directions. That's super cool. Thanks! What I propose is officially Python endorsed cluster standard. Am I over thinking this? Or the status quo is good enough for everyone else? Here is

Re: [Web-SIG] Nodejs cluster

2014-03-19 Thread Roberto De Ioris
nodejs cluster looks no more than a simple master + workers model Yes, NodeJS cluster is simple, But IMHO it's the gravity which unifies the Nodejs ecosystem. While in Python world we only have WSGI and everyone else has its own cluster model. (Please correct me if I am wrong!) Completely

Re: [Web-SIG] Nodejs cluster

2014-03-19 Thread est
sharing structures and data between nodes comes first Must agree with this. How many people out there use Redis as de facto semaphores and event synchronizing mechanism? (Think of Resque and all its glorious spin-offs) On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 2:31 PM, Roberto De Ioris robe...@unbit.it wrote:

Re: [Web-SIG] Nodejs cluster

2014-03-18 Thread anatoly techtonik
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 5:16 AM, est electronix...@gmail.com wrote: IPython.parallel http://ipython.org/ipython-doc/stable/install/install.html#dependencies-for-ipython-parallel-parallel-computing It's based on ZeroMQ(PyZMQ), and the `ssh` command. I don't think that's lightweigh enough

Re: [Web-SIG] Nodejs cluster

2014-03-18 Thread est
is that client is limited to send operations only and requests to HTTP(S) protocol only. Is that true? All other parts of the system can communicate with whatever protocols they like. Yes! Every incoming requests are HTTP. There also need to be a long running process to hold all the fd pools

Re: [Web-SIG] Nodejs cluster

2014-03-18 Thread exarkun
From: est electronix...@gmail.com Thank you guys for all the info. Twisted Web is cool, but there's it's not as interchangeable as WSGI. Twisted Web includes a WSGI container. You can run any WSGI application in it. Jean-Paul ___ Web-SIG mailing

Re: [Web-SIG] Nodejs cluster

2014-03-17 Thread exarkun
From: est electronix...@gmail.com Recently I've been playing with Nodejs and websockets, looks like their community has advanced far ahead of us. For example http://nodejs.org/api/cluster.html The best we've got is something like Celery, or Telegraphy for Django, We The example I gave for

Re: [Web-SIG] Nodejs cluster

2014-03-17 Thread anatoly techtonik
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 3:53 AM, est electronix...@gmail.com wrote: The best we've got is something like Celery, or Telegraphy for Django Does IPython suits pattern better? http://ipython.org/ipython-doc/stable/parallel/parallel_intro.html What do you guys think? I think not to reinvent the

Re: [Web-SIG] Nodejs cluster

2014-03-17 Thread est
Thank you guys for all the info. Twisted Web is cool, but there's it's not as interchangeable as WSGI. You can use whatever framework django/flask/webpy/bottle you like and plug it in as long as it's PEP-333 compatible. Not so much for Twisted and Tornado's own ioloop engine. IPython.parallel