Rene Dudfield wrote:
On 4/30/05, Steve Holden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snippety snip]
Seems to me that mod_python isn't really suitable for a shared-hosting
environment because of the need to restart the server when
indirectly-imported modules are updated, a situation that I believe
mod_python d
On 4/30/05, Steve Holden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ian Bicking wrote:
> > Peter Hunt wrote:
> >
> >> Actually, I think a mod_wsgi for Apache and IIS would be one of _the_
> >> most important things for WSGI. I think that it would search for a
> >> __wsgi__.py file (or maybe something with a bett
mike bayer wrote:
while this is not an exciting option, if separate per-user processes are
needed, there is always apache going via mod_proxy to sub-instances of
apache that run for each user's account on different ports, each running
mod_python. im not sure how feasable that is to run many server
Jacob Smullyan wrote:
On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 11:53:30AM -0500, Ian Bicking wrote:
I can imagine a good setup for hosts being one based on forking per-user
processes, which is adaptive primarily to scale down -- e.g., a largely
dorman app could have 1 or even 0 processes running (at 0 it becomes
while this is not an exciting option, if separate per-user processes are
needed, there is always apache going via mod_proxy to sub-instances of
apache that run for each user's account on different ports, each running
mod_python. im not sure how feasable that is to run many servers in
various share
> Peter Hunt wrote:
>> Actually, I think a mod_wsgi for Apache and IIS would be one of _the_
>> most important things for WSGI. I think that it would search for a
>> __wsgi__.py file (or maybe something with a better name) which would
>> expose a WSGI application named "application" that would hand
On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 11:53:30AM -0500, Ian Bicking wrote:
> I can imagine a good setup for hosts being one based on forking per-user
> processes, which is adaptive primarily to scale down -- e.g., a largely
> dorman app could have 1 or even 0 processes running (at 0 it becomes
> similar to CG
Ian Bicking wrote:
Peter Hunt wrote:
Actually, I think a mod_wsgi for Apache and IIS would be one of _the_
most important things for WSGI. I think that it would search for a
__wsgi__.py file (or maybe something with a better name) which would
expose a WSGI application named "application" that wo
Peter Hunt wrote:
Actually, I think a mod_wsgi for Apache and IIS would be one of _the_
most important things for WSGI. I think that it would search for a
__wsgi__.py file (or maybe something with a better name) which would
expose a WSGI application named "application" that would handle requests
Actually, I think a mod_wsgi for Apache and IIS would be one of _the_ most important things for WSGI. I think that it would search for a __wsgi__.py file (or maybe something with a better name) which would expose a WSGI application named "application" that would handle requests for the directory in
10 matches
Mail list logo
