Re: [Web-SIG] thoughts on an iterator

2009-03-30 Thread Alan Kennedy
Hi all, It was great to meet (nearly) everybody at PyCon; I look forward to the next time. I particularly want to thank Robert for being so meticulous about recording and reporting the discussions; a necessary part of moving forward, IMO. [Robert] > H. Graham brought up chunked requests whic

Re: [Web-SIG] thoughts on an iterator

2009-03-30 Thread Ian Bicking
2009/3/28 Robert Brewer : > H. Graham brought up chunked requests which I don't think have much > bearing on this issue--the server/app can't rely on the client-specified > chunk sizes either way (or you enable a Denial of Service attack). I > don't see much difference between the file approach

Re: [Web-SIG] thoughts on an iterator

2009-03-28 Thread Robert Brewer
Brandon Craig Rhodes wrote: > Graham, I confess that it was I who brought up the idea of a wsgi.input > iterator at the WSGI Open Space yesterday evening. :-) The discussion > seemed to be assuming a file-like input object that could be read from > by a piece of middleware, then "backed up" or "rew

[Web-SIG] thoughts on an iterator

2009-03-28 Thread Brandon Craig Rhodes
Graham, I confess that it was I who brought up the idea of a wsgi.input iterator at the WSGI Open Space yesterday evening. :-) The discussion seemed to be assuming a file-like input object that could be read from by a piece of middleware, then "backed up" or "rewound" before passing it down to the