P.J. Eby ha scritto:
> At 02:04 PM 4/10/2010 +0100, Chris Dent wrote:
>> I realize I'm able to build up a complete string or yield via a
>> generator, or a whole bunch of various ways to accomplish things
>> (which is part of why I like WSGI: that content is just an iterator,
>> that's a good thing
On 10 April 2010 23:04, Chris Dent wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Apr 2010, P.J. Eby wrote:
>
>> This is also a good time for people to learn that generators are usually a
>> *very bad* way to write WSGI apps - yielding is for server push or sending
>> blocks of large files, not tiny strings. In general, if
At 02:04 PM 4/10/2010 +0100, Chris Dent wrote:
I realize I'm able to build up a complete string or yield via a
generator, or a whole bunch of various ways to accomplish things
(which is part of why I like WSGI: that content is just an iterator,
that's a good thing) so I'm not looking for a statem
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 15:04, Chris Dent wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Apr 2010, P.J. Eby wrote:
>> This is also a good time for people to learn that generators are usually a
>> *very bad* way to write WSGI apps - yielding is for server push or sending
>> blocks of large files, not tiny strings. In general
On Thu, 8 Apr 2010, P.J. Eby wrote:
This is also a good time for people to learn that generators are usually a
*very bad* way to write WSGI apps - yielding is for server push or sending
blocks of large files, not tiny strings. In general, if you're yielding more
than one block, you're almost
