Re: [Web-SIG] Standalone WSGI form framework.

2006-03-16 Thread Alan Kennedy
[Alan Kennedy] > I'm looking for a framework-independent form library. I'm using the > Quixote forms library at the moment, inside my own framework, but > would ideally like something more WSGI oriented, so that it is easier > to mock and unittest. [Daniel Miller] > Have you looked at Ian Bicking'

Re: [Web-SIG] Standalone WSGI form framework.

2006-03-16 Thread Alan Kennedy
[Alan Kennedy] > I'm looking for a framework-independent form library. I'm using the > Quixote forms library at the moment, inside my own framework, but > would ideally like something more WSGI oriented, so that it is easier > to mock and unittest. [Titus Brown] > I'm confused by this -- this coul

Re: [Web-SIG] Standalone WSGI form framework.

2006-03-16 Thread Titus Brown
On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 05:34:42PM +, Alan Kennedy wrote: -> [Alan Kennedy] -> > I'm looking for a framework-independent form library. I'm using the -> > Quixote forms library at the moment, inside my own framework, but -> > would ideally like something more WSGI oriented, so that it is easier

Re: [Web-SIG] Standalone WSGI form framework.

2006-03-16 Thread Alan Kennedy
[Alan Kennedy] > But I'm tired of hacking on it to make it do what I want: I'd much > prefer to start afresh with my own design than to continue to use > Quixote: it's just too limiting. [Titus Brown] > I think you mistook my question for a criticism ;). Rewrite or no, I'm > mostly interested in

Re: [Web-SIG] Standalone WSGI form framework.

2006-03-16 Thread Ian Bicking
Alan Kennedy wrote: >>I think "the one true web framework" could be made for Python if >>someone took the best ideas from Spring WebMVC and made a few >>component-ized building blocks on top of which complex and widely >>varied applications could be built. > > > Completely agreed. The term "meta-

Re: [Web-SIG] Standalone WSGI form framework.

2006-03-16 Thread Ben Bangert
On Mar 16, 2006, at 9:33 AM, Alan Kennedy wrote: > Completely agreed. The term "meta-framework" is most appropriate, I > think. If we could agree on a set of interfaces, then everyone would > be free to contribute implementations of their own componments. I've also heard the term micro-framework

Re: [Web-SIG] Standalone WSGI form framework

2006-03-16 Thread Daniel Miller
Alan Kennedy wrote: > [Alan Kennedy] >> I'm looking for a framework-independent form library. I'm using the >> Quixote forms library at the moment, inside my own framework, but >> would ideally like something more WSGI oriented, so that it is easier >> to mock and unittest. > > [Daniel Miller] >>