Re: [Web-SIG] routing_args (was url_vars)

2006-11-07 Thread William Dode
On 06-11-2006, Ian Bicking wrote: > Luke Arno wrote: >> So, it seemed to me like we had agreement on >> this. Does anyone disagree? >> >> environ['routing_args'] == (list_or_tuple, a_dict) >> >> Should the spec get updated and marked as >> accepted? > > I think so, with 'wsgiorg.routing_args'. I

Re: [Web-SIG] routing_args (was url_vars)

2006-11-07 Thread Ian Bicking
William Dode wrote: > On 06-11-2006, Ian Bicking wrote: >> Luke Arno wrote: >>> So, it seemed to me like we had agreement on >>> this. Does anyone disagree? >>> >>> environ['routing_args'] == (list_or_tuple, a_dict) >>> >>> Should the spec get updated and marked as >>> accepted? >> I think so, with

Re: [Web-SIG] routing_args (was url_vars)

2006-11-07 Thread Ben Bangert
On Nov 6, 2006, at 7:48 AM, Luke Arno wrote: > So, it seemed to me like we had agreement on > this. Does anyone disagree? > environ['routing_args'] == (list_or_tuple, a_dict) > > Should the spec get updated and marked as > accepted? > +1 here, when its finalized (how many more needed?) I'll incl

[Web-SIG] routing_args accepted - selector updated

2006-11-07 Thread Luke Arno
I see that Ian has marked the proposed routing args convention as accepted. I have updated selector and now consider it a stable feature so feel free to use it. http://wsgi.org/wsgi/Specifications/routing_args https://lukearno.com/projects/selector/ Cheers, - Luke

Re: [Web-SIG] routing_args accepted - selector updated

2006-11-07 Thread Sylvain Hellegouarch
Luke Arno wrote: > I see that Ian has marked the proposed routing args > convention as accepted. I have updated selector and > now consider it a stable feature so feel free to use it. > > http://wsgi.org/wsgi/Specifications/routing_args > https://lukearno.com/projects/selector/ > Hello there, S