> I submitted my contributor agreement a while ago, so it should be on file.
> My goal has always been to bring forward httplib2 for inclusion in the
> std lib, but I didn't want to do that until I got support for proxies, which
> just recently went in, and then there's starting to work at Goog
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 7:34 PM, Joe Gregorio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 8:16 PM, Brett Cannon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 2:48 PM, Ian Bicking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Brett Cannon wrote:
> > > > which I am liking. But I figure
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 4:16 AM, Brett Cannon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Have the code written and meeting PEP 7/8 standards.
Done. Well, as far as I can tell, though the distribution
of the code might not conform as there it a lot of
code in __init_.py.
> * Thorough unit tests using unitt
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 11:00 AM, Joe Gregorio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Many unit tests done in unittest. They fall into
> two categories, those that run locally and those
> that run against a set of URIs on the web. Is there
> a stdlib way of segregating those tests? All the
> code for th
Joe Gregorio wrote:
>> * Thorough unit tests using unittest or doctest.
>
> Done.
>
> http://httplib2.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/httplib2test.py
>
> Many unit tests done in unittest. They fall into
> two categories, those that run locally and those
> that run against a set of URIs on the web. Is
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 1:45 PM, Fred Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This looks like you used the old LaTeX format; there's a new format
> starting with Python 2.6:
>
> http://docs.python.org/dev/documenting/index.html
Oh, reST, cool.
Is there a tool for doing the majority of the work of
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 2:08 PM, Joe Gregorio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there a tool for doing the majority of the work of converting the
> old LaTeX into reST?
I think there is; if you ask python-docs python.org, you'll be
asking the people who know.
-Fred
--
Fred L. Drake, Jr.
"Ch
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 2:09 PM, Ian Bicking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I guess this is a test-related feature request: something that would be
> nice, and that I don't believe httplib2 specifically allows (though
> maybe I am unaware of it) is a clear/documented way to mock http calls.
> ws
Joe Gregorio wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 2:09 PM, Ian Bicking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I guess this is a test-related feature request: something that would be
>> nice, and that I don't believe httplib2 specifically allows (though
>> maybe I am unaware of it) is a clear/documented way t
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 4:52 PM, Brett Cannon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> which I am liking. But I figured I would ask if there is any remote
> chance the this SIG has plans to either merge urllib and urllib2 or
> come up with a new module, or something before 3.0 comes out.
> Otherwise MAL's
10 matches
Mail list logo
