Re: [Web-SIG] Is PEP 3333 the final solution for WSGI on Python 3?

Hi, On 10/23/10 7:43 PM, P.J. Eby wrote: I don't think it's an either-or case. PEP just means that there's a clear path to port WSGI 1 apps. If somebody wants to champion a WSGI 1.1, a 2.0, and whatever else, that's great! Oh, I was not denying that. The original post on reddit to which I

Re: [Web-SIG] Is PEP 3333 the final solution for WSGI on Python 3?

On Sun, 2010-10-24 at 10:17 +0300, Armin Ronacher wrote: > I have to admit that my interest in Python 3 is not very high and I am > most likely not the most reliable person when it comes to driving PEP 444 :) We should probably withdraw the PEP, then (unless someone else wants to step up and cha

Re: [Web-SIG] Is PEP 3333 the final solution for WSGI on Python 3?

Am 24.10.2010 16:40, schrieb Chris McDonough: > On Sun, 2010-10-24 at 10:17 +0300, Armin Ronacher wrote: > >> I have to admit that my interest in Python 3 is not very high and I am >> most likely not the most reliable person when it comes to driving PEP 444 :) > > We should probably withdraw the

Re: [Web-SIG] Is PEP 3333 the final solution for WSGI on Python 3?

On Sun, 2010-10-24 at 17:16 +0200, Georg Brandl wrote: > Am 24.10.2010 16:40, schrieb Chris McDonough: > > On Sun, 2010-10-24 at 10:17 +0300, Armin Ronacher wrote: > > > >> I have to admit that my interest in Python 3 is not very high and I am > >> most likely not the most reliable person when it

Re: [Web-SIG] Is PEP 3333 the final solution for WSGI on Python 3?

Am 24.10.2010 17:58, schrieb Chris McDonough: > On Sun, 2010-10-24 at 17:16 +0200, Georg Brandl wrote: >> Am 24.10.2010 16:40, schrieb Chris McDonough: >> > On Sun, 2010-10-24 at 10:17 +0300, Armin Ronacher wrote: >> > >> >> I have to admit that my interest in Python 3 is not very high and I am >

Re: [Web-SIG] Is PEP 3333 the final solution for WSGI on Python 3?

On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 10:17 AM, Georg Brandl wrote: > Am 24.10.2010 17:58, schrieb Chris McDonough: >> On Sun, 2010-10-24 at 17:16 +0200, Georg Brandl wrote: >>> Am 24.10.2010 16:40, schrieb Chris McDonough: >>> > On Sun, 2010-10-24 at 10:17 +0300, Armin Ronacher wrote: >>> > >>> >> I have to ad

Re: [Web-SIG] Is PEP 3333 the final solution for WSGI on Python 3?

Am 24.10.2010 19:25, schrieb Guido van Rossum: > On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 10:17 AM, Georg Brandl wrote: >> Am 24.10.2010 17:58, schrieb Chris McDonough: >>> On Sun, 2010-10-24 at 17:16 +0200, Georg Brandl wrote: Am 24.10.2010 16:40, schrieb Chris McDonough: > On Sun, 2010-10-24 at 10:17 +