How do you build a release and upload it to PyPi? Upload docs to
packages.python.org? setup.py commands. It's a convienent hook
with
access to metadata in a convienent way that would make an excellent
let's make a release! type of command.
setup.py should go away. The distutils2 talk from
Hi,
As an aside, I wonder why people use dot+colon notation instead of just
dots to reference callables. In distutils2 for example we resolve
dotted names to find command classes, command hooks and compilers. So
what’s the benefit, marginally easier parsing?
Regards
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 1:32 PM, Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org wrote:
As an aside, I wonder why people use dot+colon notation instead of just
dots to reference callables. In distutils2 for example we resolve
dotted names to find command classes, command hooks and compilers. So
what’s the
On 2011-04-15 11:02:17 -0700, Jim Fulton said:
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 1:32 PM, Éric Araujo
mer...@netwok.org wrote:
As an aside, I wonder why people use dot+colon notation instead of just
dots to reference callables. In distutils2 for example we resolve
dotted names to find command classes,
On 2011-04-14 10:34:59 -0700, Ian Bicking said:
I think there's a general concept we should have, which I'll call a
script -- but basically it's a script to run (__main__-style), a
callable to call (module:name), or a URL to fetch internally.
Agreed. The reference notation I mentioned in my
At 02:02 PM 4/15/2011 -0400, Jim Fulton wrote:
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 1:32 PM, Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org wrote:
As an aside, I wonder why people use dot+colon notation instead of just
dots to reference callables. In distutils2 for example we resolve
dotted names to find command classes,
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 1:32 PM, Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org wrote:
As an aside, I wonder why people use dot+colon notation instead of just
dots to reference callables. In distutils2 for example we resolve
dotted names to find command classes, command hooks and compilers.
I advocated using
On 06:22 pm, al...@gothcandy.com wrote:
On 2011-04-15 11:02:17 -0700, Jim Fulton said:
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 1:32 PM, Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org
wrote:
As an aside, I wonder why people use dot+colon notation instead of
just dots to reference callables. In distutils2 for example we
At 04:11 PM 4/15/2011 -0400, Fred Drake wrote:
These end users don't really care if the object identified is a class or
function in module, a nested attribute on a class, or anything else, so
long as it does what it's advertised to do. By not pushing implementation
details into the identifier,
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 6:06 PM, P.J. Eby p...@telecommunity.com wrote:
That would be one advantage of using entry points instead. ;-) (i.e., the
user doesn't specify the object location, the package author does.)
Definitely! I'm certainly all in favor of having something very akin to entry
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 2:05 PM, Alice Bevan–McGregor
al...@gothcandy.comwrote:
I want to keep this distinct from anything long-running, which is a much
more complex deal.
The primary application is only potentially long-running. (You could, in
theory, deploy an app as CGI, but that way
11 matches
Mail list logo
