[web2py] Re: web2py website

On Wednesday, February 21, 2024 at 11:29:07 AM UTC-8 syna...@gmail.com wrote: Will the web2py website be getting a refresh anytime? That award badge - it's from 14 years ago. web2py is in maintenance mode. Spiffing up the website isn't an important sales tool. Here's hoping py4web gets

[web2py] Re: web2py 2.27.1 released

yes. sorry had forgotten to push the tags. -- Resources: - http://web2py.com - http://web2py.com/book (Documentation) - http://github.com/web2py/web2py (Source code) - https://code.google.com/p/web2py/issues/list (Report Issues) --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the

[web2py] Re: web2py 2.27.1 released

Great! where we can find it? https://github.com/web2py/web2py/tags ? On Saturday, November 18, 2023 at 7:15:07 PM UTC-3 ra...@tarkus.mx wrote: > Excellent !!! > > On Thursday, November 16, 2023 at 1:10:43 AM UTC-7 Massimo Di Pierro wrote: > >> web2py 2.27.1 was released >> >> - some linting and

[web2py] Re: web2py 2.27.1 released

Excellent !!! On Thursday, November 16, 2023 at 1:10:43 AM UTC-7 Massimo Di Pierro wrote: > web2py 2.27.1 was released > > - some linting and formatting > - added support to Python 3.11 > - fixed regexen and classname > - removed a circular dependency > > -- Resources: - http://web2py.com -

Re: [web2py] Re: web2py 2.26.1 released

I highly recommend moving to py4web. These days I dread working on web2py apps we haven't yet converted to py4web. py4web is so much faster for execution and development. Much more flexibility in form and grid layouts. If there is something missing, let us know, we'd love to get more

Re: [web2py] Re: web2py 2.26.1 released

In my opinion Web2py is really comfortable but I strongly recommend to move to py4web. The scheduler in web2py is replaced with celery which is more powerful and py4web framework is really fast, light and is easy to code like in web2py. I’ve moved all my apps from web2py to py4web and I can’t

Re: [web2py] Re: web2py 2.26.1 released

I´m so comfortable with web2py, the admin dashboard and the scheduler are blocking me from moving to py4web... Regards Em seg., 30 de out. de 2023 às 04:48, Raul Monares escreveu: > Great news. I appreatiate your work on both platforms > > On Sunday, October 29, 2023 at 3:13:31 PM UTC-6 Massimo

[web2py] Re: web2py 2.26.1 released

Great news. I appreatiate your work on both platforms On Sunday, October 29, 2023 at 3:13:31 PM UTC-6 Massimo Di Pierro wrote: > Changelog: > - adds support of python up to version 3.11 > - fixes a bug with serialization of headers introduced in version 2.25.1 > - improves handling of unstable

[web2py] Re: web2py 2.25.1 - bug when running interactive shell?

It should be abspath and should be fixed in master. I plan to release a new version today. On Friday, 27 October 2023 at 01:28:59 UTC-7 Tom Clerckx wrote: > I believe web2py/gluon/shell.py", line 238 should use os.path.*abspath* > instead of *absdir*? > > Unpacked and ran a clean version of

[web2py] Re: Web2py move to a new server resulted in this 'CommonDialect' object has no attribute 'eq'

This is a know issue with has been fixed in master. I will release a new version later today. On Sunday, 22 October 2023 at 02:07:32 UTC-7 vald...@gmail.com wrote: > Whenever I reload, It seems to create a new thread showing this in the CLI. > > For example, when I attempt to run the app, the

[web2py] Re: Web2py move to a new server resulted in this 'CommonDialect' object has no attribute 'eq'

Whenever I reload, It seems to create a new thread showing this in the CLI. For example, when I attempt to run the app, the error, shown below, starts with: " ERROR:Rocket.Errors.Thread-2:Traceback (most recent call last):" The next time it runs showing " ERROR:Rocket.Errors.Thread-4:Traceback

[web2py] Re: Web2py move to a new server resulted in this 'CommonDialect' object has no attribute 'eq'

It's as if any attempt to read tables based on the db object causes this error. I was getting this error where IS_IN_DB that references other tables as base tables. I've moved all those references from the models completely and now I'm getting the error when I attempt to log in to the app.

[web2py] Re: web2py 2.25.1

Hello. I believe this error is related to a thread I opened a few days ago: " File Download Broken after Pull Request #2471 " https://groups.google.com/g/web2py/c/ruhme28jvNo Carlos. El miércoles, 18 de octubre de 2023 a las 18:49:34 UTC+2, xgp.l...@gmail.com escribió: > Hi, > > Modified the

[web2py] Re: web2py 2.25.1

Hi, Modified the code to this: for k, v in iteritems(headers): if isinstance(v, list): rheaders += [(k, str(item)) for item in v] else: rheaders.append((k, str(v))) This was the code from version 2.24.1 Dont know if this is correct.

[web2py] Re: web2py 2.25.1

Hi Massimo, Getting this redirecting from nginx to uwsgi_pass http port. Traceback (most recent call last): File "/home/www-data/web2py/gluon/main.py", line 562, in wsgibase return http_response.to(responder, env=env) File "/home/www-data/web2py/gluon/http.py", line 129, in to

[web2py] Re: web2py 2.25.1

A fantastic job. Thank you very much. Carlos. El domingo, 8 de octubre de 2023 a las 20:59:27 UTC+2, Massimo Di Pierro escribió: > Hello everybody, > > A new version of web2py, 2.25.1, is out. > > It contains some bug fixes, #2468 #2468 #2236, http headers sanitization, > and fixes this

[web2py] Re: Web2py dal significantly slower than raw query

Think an int, that needs to be "casted" to an int for 50k times. You can't expect an abstraction layer to be as fast as raw sql. DAL doesn't just write queries for you, it adapts the resultset to the model. 50k rows in less than 2 seconds is not that bad. On Tuesday, October 3, 2023 at 8:29:12 

[web2py] Re: Web2py dal significantly slower than raw query

12 columns, 50k rows (17k rows in the query result) cacheable=True is about 0.3s faster. The costliness of building the whole model comes (mostly) from reference types? On Monday, October 2, 2023 at 11:22:53 PM UTC+2 Niphlod wrote: > how many rows and how many columns ? the raw one is

[web2py] Re: Web2py dal significantly slower than raw query

how many rows and how many columns ? the raw one is returning whatever type the underlying database structure has as it is, the pydal one is building the whole model (including references) did you try with cacheable=True in the pydal one ? it won't build update_records and delete_records, for

[web2py] Re: Web2py dal significantly slower than raw query

The only thing I can see is that the SQL needs to be 'built' by pydal, but I find it hard to believe it takes a whole second. Massimo might have to add context here. -Jim On Monday, October 2, 2023 at 1:00:19 PM UTC-5 urban@gmail.com wrote: > Sorry my bad! I mixed up the timings when

[web2py] Re: Web2py dal significantly slower than raw query

Sorry my bad! I mixed up the timings when editing the post. The slower timing is for the dal version. Moreover the dal version is slower even if I remove the .as_list() call. I had originally tried that. When I get the time I'll try "debugging" it by looking at the dal.py source. Asking here if

[web2py] Re: Web2py dal significantly slower than raw query

It's possible I'm reading this wrong (it is Monday morning), but .09s (DAL) is faster than 1.8s (raw SQL). Is that a typo? Or, is it my Monday-morning-brain? If your raw query is slower, could it be because you're converting to a dict instead of a list as in your dal query? -Jim On

[web2py] Re: web2py 2.24.1 released

Thanks četvrtak, 23. mart 2023. u 06:20:20 UTC+1 Massimo Di Pierro je napisao/la: > Hello everybody, > > web2py 2.24.1 has been released. > > Thanks to Leonel, Cem, and Mark for bug fixes including: > - handling corrupt disk cache > - broken application packaging > - compare function logic > > >

[web2py] Re: web2py 2.24.1 released

Excelent news. Thanks !! On Thursday, March 23, 2023 at 5:43:34 AM UTC-6 xgp.l...@gmail.com wrote: > Thank you Massimo! > > El jueves, 23 de marzo de 2023 a las 0:20:20 UTC-5, Massimo Di Pierro > escribió: > >> Hello everybody, >> >> web2py 2.24.1 has been released. >> >> Thanks to Leonel, Cem,

[web2py] Re: web2py 2.24.1 released

Thank you Massimo! El jueves, 23 de marzo de 2023 a las 0:20:20 UTC-5, Massimo Di Pierro escribió: > Hello everybody, > > web2py 2.24.1 has been released. > > Thanks to Leonel, Cem, and Mark for bug fixes including: > - handling corrupt disk cache > - broken application packaging > - compare

[web2py] Re: web2py 2.23.0 is giving a 403 error when I try to package my applications

This has been fixed and 2.24.1 released. My apologies for overlooking the issue. On Sunday, 26 February 2023 at 05:51:30 UTC-8 pcwa...@comcast.net wrote: > I submitted an issue #2457 > a month ago. Please leverage that one. > > On Monday, February

[web2py] Re: web2py 2.23.0 is giving a 403 error when I try to package my applications

I submitted an issue #2457 a month ago. Please leverage that one. On Monday, February 13, 2023 at 12:28:40 AM UTC-7 david@gmail.com wrote: > Hi pcg, > > I also created a bug report for this one and got a message from Massimo > that it would be

[web2py] Re: web2py with rocket server + nginx ?

On Thursday, February 16, 2023 at 7:26:40 AM UTC-8 chriii...@gmail.com wrote: Hello! I'm wondering if it is a good idea to use web2py with rocket server in combination with nginx as a reverse proxy like in py4web. I need to run py4web and web2py on the same server and using nginx without

[web2py] Re: web2py 2.23.0 is giving a 403 error when I try to package my applications

Hi pcg, I also created a bug report for this one and got a message from Massimo that it would be fixed in a new release. A work-around I used was to simply put the code below in the admin default.py into comment: *#if not a_for_check.startswith(web2py_apps_root):* *#raise HTTP(403)

[web2py] Re: web2py 2.23.0 is giving a 403 error when I try to package my applications

Have the same issue (python 3.10) i've tried the latest web2py 2.23.1, and it's th same. I'm kind of lost on this one. Le lundi 9 janvier 2023 à 05:44:16 UTC-5, david@gmail.com a écrit : > I am using python 3.9.15 > > On Monday, January 9, 2023 at 11:00:22 AM UTC+1 Clemens wrote: > >>

[web2py] Re: web2py 2.23.0 is giving a 403 error when I try to package my applications

I am using python 3.9.15 On Monday, January 9, 2023 at 11:00:22 AM UTC+1 Clemens wrote: > Just a guess: What python version are you using? If you're still using > python 2, it could be the reason. > > On Monday, January 9, 2023 at 10:55:21 AM UTC+1 david@gmail.com wrote: > >> Which is in

[web2py] Re: web2py 2.23.0 is giving a 403 error when I try to package my applications

Just a guess: What python version are you using? If you're still using python 2, it could be the reason. On Monday, January 9, 2023 at 10:55:21 AM UTC+1 david@gmail.com wrote: > Which is in turn caused by: > > *def app_pack*(app, request, raise_ex=False, filenames=None): > """Builds a

[web2py] Re: web2py 2.23.0 is giving a 403 error when I try to package my applications

Which is in turn caused by: *def app_pack*(app, request, raise_ex=False, filenames=None): """Builds a w2p package for the application Args: app(str): application name request: the global request object Returns: filename of the w2p file or None on error

[web2py] Re: web2py 2.23.0 is giving a 403 error when I try to package my applications

I found where this is occurring (out of the box run, no mods): C:\Users\u30591\web2py_2.23.0\web2py\applications\admin\controllers\default.py: def safe_open(a, b): if (DEMO_MODE or is_gae) and ('w' in b or 'a' in b): class tmp: def write(self, data): pass

[web2py] Re: web2py 2.23.0 is giving a 403 error when I try to package my applications

I just did a test on my own PC with web2py out of the box and I got a 403 error when packing the application. Now that I know that it has nothing to do with the webserver, I will try to debug the issue. I will debug the issue to determine where in the code it is occurring. On Thursday, January

[web2py] Re: web2py 2.23.0 released

Great news. Thanks a lot !! On Thursday, December 29, 2022 at 3:15:56 AM UTC-7 Stephan wrote: > Thank you!! > > Massimo Di Pierro schrieb am Dienstag, 27. Dezember 2022 um 08:26:00 UTC+1: > >> Hello Everybody, >> >> My apologies for not being as engaged in this group as I used to be. >> >>

[web2py] Re: web2py 2.23.0 released

Thank you!! Massimo Di Pierro schrieb am Dienstag, 27. Dezember 2022 um 08:26:00 UTC+1: > Hello Everybody, > > My apologies for not being as engaged in this group as I used to be. > > web2py 2.23.0 was released. > > It includes: > - DKIM support to emails > - More configuration options for

[web2py] Re: Web2py deployment on a local so all computers in the network can acess it

On Monday, August 29, 2022 at 3:13:02 AM UTC-7 silvia...@gmail.com wrote: > I will run it on a virtual server I think > Sounds like a good choice. Many virtual server providers make provisioning easy. /dps > > snide...@gmail.com schrieb am Montag, 29. August 2022 um 15:14:58 UTC+7: > >>

[web2py] Re: Web2py deployment on a local so all computers in the network can acess it

I will run it on a virtual server I think snide...@gmail.com schrieb am Montag, 29. August 2022 um 15:14:58 UTC+7: > On Wednesday, August 24, 2022 at 7:59:43 PM UTC-7 silvia...@gmail.com > wrote: > >> Thanks Tom I will try that >> >> Tom Clerckx schrieb am Mittwoch, 24. August 2022 um 16:53:30

[web2py] Re: Web2py deployment on a local so all computers in the network can acess it

On Wednesday, August 24, 2022 at 7:59:43 PM UTC-7 silvia...@gmail.com wrote: > Thanks Tom I will try that > > Tom Clerckx schrieb am Mittwoch, 24. August 2022 um 16:53:30 UTC+7: > >> Not sure what information you're looking for. >> There is no dependency on having an internet connection to

[web2py] Re: Web2py deployment on a local so all computers in the network can acess it

Thanks Tom I will try that Tom Clerckx schrieb am Mittwoch, 24. August 2022 um 16:53:30 UTC+7: > Not sure what information you're looking for. > There is no dependency on having an internet connection to deploy your > web2py service. > > With respect to deployment itself, you can follow the

[web2py] Re: Web2py deployment on a local so all computers in the network can acess it

Not sure what information you're looking for. There is no dependency on having an internet connection to deploy your web2py service. With respect to deployment itself, you can follow the deployment recipes in the web2py manual. Tom. On Wednesday, August 24, 2022 at 11:49:13 AM UTC+2

[web2py] Re: web2py: How to execute further code after ajax call

FYI, already answered at https://stackoverflow.com/a/73338318/440323. On Saturday, August 13, 2022 at 10:37:06 PM UTC-4 JPlata wrote: > > > I have two dropdown/select widgets on a form. I am trying to set the > options of the second select

[web2py] Re: Web2py on MySQL 8.0

Solved. The problem was PyMySQL for python 2.7 (used by my web2py). With pip install PyMySQL it install for Python 3.8. I installed PyMySQL for python 2.7 with: wget https://bootstrap.pypa.io/pip/2.7/get-pip.py python2 get-pip.py python2 -m pip install PyMySQL Il giorno venerdì 25 marzo 2022

[web2py] Re: web2py cannot import csv return strings not byte

Have a look here: https://groups.google.com/g/web2py/c/HGTQlEVc2qw/m/toCPLKKwCAAJ Best regards Clemens On Wednesday, January 6, 2021 at 12:09:14 AM UTC+1 lcham...@gmail.com wrote: > *To Reproduce* > > Steps to reproduce the behavior: > >1. Create a new project(*New simple application*). >

[web2py] Re: Web2py Scheduler, db query is not executing.

Have you tried adding a db.commit() to your delete_after_hours() function? -Jim On Tuesday, October 5, 2021 at 8:49:44 AM UTC-5 Andrew wrote: > Hello, I am trying to run a database query using the web2py scheduler, but > for some reason I can't get the query to commit. I've tested the

[web2py] Re: Web2py site ssl expired

Thanks for reminding me about this. I will renew it asap. On Wednesday, 22 September 2021 at 00:06:06 UTC-7 snide...@gmail.com wrote: > On Wednesday, September 15, 2021 at 2:39:19 AM UTC-7 dirman wrote: > >> >> Well same from my end. SSL expired >> On Saturday, September 11, 2021 at 2:04:38 PM

[web2py] Re: Web2py site ssl expired

On Wednesday, September 15, 2021 at 2:39:19 AM UTC-7 dirman wrote: > > Well same from my end. SSL expired > On Saturday, September 11, 2021 at 2:04:38 PM UTC+1 rodrig...@gmail.com > wrote: > >> Hello my friends, I don't know for report this. >> https://web2py.com/ when I access this url. >>

[web2py] Re: Web2py site ssl expired

Well same from my end. SSL expired On Saturday, September 11, 2021 at 2:04:38 PM UTC+1 rodrig...@gmail.com wrote: > Hello my friends, I don't know for report this. > https://web2py.com/ when I access this url. > This not show with http. > -- Resources: - http://web2py.com -

[web2py] Re: web2py app on startup trying to create a duplicate table auth_user

And the solution is to add fake_migrate=True into the DAL statement and the auth.define_tables statement. On Saturday, April 17, 2021 at 6:35:05 PM UTC-7 james c. wrote: > db = DAL(myconf.get('db.uri'), > auto_import = True, > ignore_field_case = True, > entity_quoting = False, > pool_size =

[web2py] Re: web2py ubuntu 16

On Tuesday, January 26, 2021 at 4:33:59 AM UTC-8 Ovidio Marinho wrote: > > > I installed web2py using the setup_ubuntu.sh script and > I don't know what is happening with these errors > > > restarting apage > > * Restarting web server apache2 AH00558: apache2: Could not reliably

Re: [web2py] Re: Web2py with python 3.8.5

Just for the record, because it's not clear from this thread, the Python 3,8 problem seems to have been taken care of. I've been running web2py on Python 3.8 for the last couple of weeks at least and never noticed a problem. On Sunday, January 3, 2021 at 2:26:52 PM UTC-6 jimka...@yahoo.com

Re: [web2py] Re: Web2py with python 3.8.5

While investigating 3.8 issues, should also be aware of the following - "3.9.1 is the first version of Python to support macOS 11 Big Sur." as per https://www.python.org/downloads/release/python-391/ On Sunday, January 3, 2021 at 1:20:45 AM UTC-8 serge.bo...@gmail.com wrote: > Hello, > I'm

Re: [web2py] Re: Web2py with python 3.8.5

Hello, I'm trying to convert my web2py apps to Ubuntu 20.4 / apache2/wsgi using python 3.8.5, and as I'm not an IT expert, the only way I found was to change the import instructions in a series of modules. I am aware I shouldn't do this, but I couldn't find any alternative... I would apreciate

[web2py] Re: web2py 2.21.1 is OUT

Will look into this asap. On Monday, 30 November 2020 at 00:34:48 UTC-8 jpa...@gmail.com wrote: > Hello, > > I think it is an issue that comes from previous version. It has to do with > IS_NOT_IN_DB validator and auth. It worked in 2.17.2 version with no problem > > Traceback (most recent call

[web2py] Re: web2py 2.21.1 is OUT

Hello, I think it is an issue that comes from previous version. It has to do with IS_NOT_IN_DB validator and auth. It worked in 2.17.2 version with no problem Traceback (most recent call last): File

Re: [web2py] Re: web2py ajax function in py4web

Also, Stifan, could you post a few use cases? py4web includes vue.js by default and I am trying to understand the most common use cases of this for documentation purposes. I am guessing: - Instant form update on client side when a value is changed (for example, a star rating or even a

[web2py] Re: web2py ajax function in py4web

Stifan Can you post this in the py4web group? In py4web we don't include any jquery components. The goal is to be as light as possible and require as few additional packages as possible. I think you'll get better visibility on the py4web list to get this question answered. I know there

[web2py] Re: Web2py adn Gzip

Hi. I was working on a http website. Anyway the https protocol don't accept gzip, so as all websites now are https, it don't have any interest to have gzip. My https websites load really faster compare to Webfaction. Good deal. Il giorno sabato 24 ottobre 2020 alle 22:14:21 UTC+2 Jose C ha

[web2py] Re: Web2py adn Gzip

On Saturday, 24 October 2020 20:13:23 UTC+1, Jose C wrote: > > > The zip_static_files.py utility in your web2py scripts directory will > create gzipped versions of all your static files for you. > >> Great. >> However something goes wrong. >> > > As a workaround, you could probably quite

[web2py] Re: Web2py adn Gzip

> The zip_static_files.py utility in your web2py scripts directory will create gzipped versions of all your static files for you. > Great. > However something goes wrong. > hmmm, what is your python version? And web2py version? I'm suspecting this tool hasn't been updated to py3. --

[web2py] Re: Web2py adn Gzip

It seems that for a similar error the solution was to update Python to almost 2.7.9. >https://github.com/numba/numba/issues/2642 On Opalstack in the virtualenv I've 2.7.5. Checking the latest version with python2 --version I obtain 2.7.5. That's strange as it exists 2.7.16. Il giorno sabato 24

[web2py] Re: Web2py adn Gzip

>Perhaps you can +1 them on this feature request. Done. > The zip_static_files.py utility in your web2py scripts directory will create gzipped versions of all your static files for you. Great. However something goes wrong. [user@vpsXX web2py]$ python web2py.py -S myapp -R

[web2py] Re: Web2py adn Gzip

I requested gzip as well for a static media site (https) and they said: Our front-end Nginx server will not use gzip compression for requests > served over HTTPS. This is by design as a mitigation for the BREACH > exploit . > > We've an internal feature

Re: [web2py] Re: web2py hosting

I've made some confusion, you're wright it's not MDDHosting where they're some old Webfaction guys but Opalstack. I'll choose a VPS from Opalstack or OVH. Did someone tried to use Webfaction on OVH? Il giorno venerdì 16 ottobre 2020 alle 18:45:41 UTC+2 Jose C ha scritto: > Did someone tried

Re: [web2py] Re: web2py hosting

> > Did someone tried this one? > https://www.mddhosting.com/ > > It seems a new company made by old Webfaction guys. > > Not sure about that. They say their company was created in 2007. WF was still brilliant then. The only 'new' company founded by ex-Webfaction guys that I know of is

Re: [web2py] Re: web2py hosting

On Friday, 16 October 2020 15:11:40 UTC+1, Ramos wrote: > > This is not good for me , opalstack is offline for support sometimes. > > Webfaction is always on and has a ticketing system with a priority flag! > Not sure how you got to that screen - looks like an online chat window? I've

Re: [web2py] Re: web2py hosting

Today Webfaction has send me the confirmation that Postgress and Web2py will be not available on tsoHost. Did someone tried this one? https://www.mddhosting.com/ It seems a new company made by old Webfaction guys. Il giorno venerdì 16 ottobre 2020 alle 16:11:40 UTC+2 Ramos ha scritto: > This

Re: [web2py] Re: web2py hosting

This is not good for me , opalstack is offline for support sometimes. Webfaction is always on and has a ticketing system with a priority flag! [image: image.png] Em sex., 16 de out. de 2020 às 10:30, Jose C escreveu: > HI Antonio, > > Can't speak as to pythonanywhere, but Opalstack

Re: [web2py] Re: web2py hosting

HI Antonio, Can't speak as to pythonanywhere, but Opalstack definitely supports automatic Letsencrypt certificates - I have it set up on all my sites. You just flip a switch on each website and the rest is handled automatically, including auto-renewals. See:

Re: [web2py] Re: web2py hosting

i need https ssl certificates (automatic letsencrypt). opalstack and pythonanywhere dont refer this option as available. also i have a virtual email address that forward incoming emails to python script like pic attached. Do pythonanywhare permit this ? i already know that opalstack dont permit

Re: [web2py] Re: web2py hosting

Hi Antonio, I just saw this announcement: https://www.webfaction.com/faq Reading the "What will not be available when I am migrated to tsohost"... makes you wonder what they actually do host on their servers! And they're starting migrations in a couple of weeks and shutting WF down 100% in

Re: [web2py] Re: web2py hosting

no python??? on TsoHost?? Em qua., 14 de out. de 2020 às 15:50, António Ramos escreveu: > no postgresql db... i´m doomed > > Em qua., 14 de out. de 2020 às 15:00, Gaël Princivalle < > gaelprinciva...@gmail.com> escreveu: > >> I think the new business TsoHost plans are the ones that will

Re: [web2py] Re: web2py hosting

no postgresql db... i´m doomed Em qua., 14 de out. de 2020 às 15:00, Gaël Princivalle < gaelprinciva...@gmail.com> escreveu: > I think the new business TsoHost plans are the ones that will replace the > Webfaction cloud plans: > https://www.tsohost.com/business-hosting > > Il giorno

[web2py] Re: web2py hosting

I think the new business TsoHost plans are the ones that will replace the Webfaction cloud plans: https://www.tsohost.com/business-hosting Il giorno mercoledì 14 ottobre 2020 alle 15:55:32 UTC+2 Gaël Princivalle ha scritto: > Hi Antonio. > > i'm worried about the same thing. > > It seems that

[web2py] Re: web2py hosting

Hi Antonio. i'm worried about the same thing. It seems that all the applications gone be migrated to TsoHost, a Godaddy company. Someone have some experience about Web2py on TsoHost ? Il giorno venerdì 22 maggio 2020 alle 09:45:12 UTC+2 Ramos ha scritto: > I´m a webfaction long time user

[web2py] Re: web2py hosting

Hi Jose, You're right no regrets at all. Just like you I very much appreciate their willingness to help you solve the problems you run into when deploying your applications. Annet Op dinsdag 13 oktober 2020 om 08:51:21 UTC+2 schreef Jose C: > Hi Annet, > > Just FYI, I'm going on 18 months

[web2py] Re: web2py hosting

Hi Annet, Just FYI, I'm going on 18 months now with Opalstack and couldn´t be happier. Running multiple web2py (and other) apps on servers in US and EU, hosted email, etc. with the same access and levels of control I'd had on WF. And most importantly, always the same incredible customer

[web2py] Re: web2py hosting

Hi Antonio, I came across your post, and thought I'd share my experience with Opalstack. I am a web developer not a server administrator, I hosted at Webfaction because their support people were very patient and helpful. After joining forces with GD support no longer stands out from the crowd.

[web2py] Re: web2py crash - Pickle

On Tuesday, September 15, 2020 at 5:20:23 PM UTC-7, clara wrote: > > Either running locally with rocket server or under Apache for every single > application (including admin), I am getting this error: > > File "C:\web2py\gluon\main.py", line 433, in wsgibase > session.connect(request,

Re: [web2py] Re: web2py online debugger under python3

Hi Seth I have no idea sorry. I would like to know the answer to this question though. Andrew On Fri, 17 Jul 2020, 7:28 am Seth J, wrote: > So, what would you recommend for "remote debugging" situation? I have > web2py running on internal firewalled Windows 2016 Server and have been >

Re: [web2py] Re: web2py online debugger under python3

So, what would you recommend for "remote debugging" situation? I have web2py running on internal firewalled Windows 2016 Server and have been struggling to adopt anything for debugging purposes. On Tuesday, May 5, 2020 at 9:11:00 PM UTC-4 roge...@gmail.com wrote: > Hi Clemens > > I think a

[web2py] Re: Web2py + Nginx - Logging

I have a system running Web2py + Nginx + ubuntu (installed with provided ubuntu script) and all print statements are logged to the uwsgi log at /var/log/uwsgi On Thursday, July 2, 2020 at 7:19:21 AM UTC+2 snide...@gmail.com wrote: > > > On Wednesday, July 1, 2020 at 2:51:32 PM UTC-7,

[web2py] Re: Web2py + Nginx - Logging

On Wednesday, July 1, 2020 at 2:51:32 PM UTC-7, Luciano Bovio wrote: > > Is it possible to log web2py output messages to a file when running > web2py+nginx+uwsgi (installed with provided ubuntu script) ? > > I need to view the messages that i see in console when running rocket > server. > >

Re: [web2py] Re: web2py online debugger under python3

Great. I have had weird problems with Visual Studio Code debugger. It seems to get confused sometimes about which line of code it is running and shows that I am executing a line different to what it is really executing. When i have that problem i switch to PyCharm and debug there. Then i head back

Re: [web2py] Re: web2py online debugger under python3

Hi Andrew, I've switched over to PyCharm and really like it. Thanks a lot for the push! Best regards Clemens On Wednesday, May 6, 2020 at 3:11:00 AM UTC+2, AGRogers wrote: > > Hi Clemens > > I think a standalone debugger is much better. The online debugger could be > great to debug

[web2py] Re: web2py hosting

I'm a former webfaction user and switched to pythonanywhere a few years ago. No regrets. -Jim On Friday, May 22, 2020 at 2:45:12 AM UTC-5, Ramos wrote: > > I´m a webfaction long time user and from another post here i got worried > about the godaddy acquisition.Eventually webfaction may die in

[web2py] Re: web2py - date picker issue

Please identify what part of this rather long file is relevant to your question. You might also want to look at the documentation for SQLFORM with regard ti how to use keepvalues. On Wednesday, May 6, 2020 at 9:44:37 AM UTC-4, Anuj Mahawar wrote: > > Yes, its part of the SQLFORM. I have

[web2py] Re: web2py - date picker issue

Yes, its part of the SQLFORM. I have attached my file from the controller. Could you please let me know where do I need to make the changes (i.e. keepvalues = True) Regards, Anuj On Tuesday, May 5, 2020 at 6:38:29 PM UTC+5:30, Scott Hunter wrote: > > If this is part of a form (which I have to

Re: [web2py] Re: web2py online debugger under python3

Hi Clemens I think a standalone debugger is much better. The online debugger could be great to debug applications in production though. Where are you doing your development? On your local machine or Python Anywhere or somewhere else? I don't think it's possible to debug using Visual Studio

Re: [web2py] Re: web2py online debugger under python3

Hi Andrew, well, I would say, it's because I ever used it and it's okay for me. But which one would you recommend? And how to connect your favorite debugger with web2py? Never used another debugger for web2py. Regards Clemens On Tuesday, May 5, 2020 at 1:56:25 AM UTC+2, AGRogers wrote: > >

[web2py] Re: web2py - date picker issue

If this is part of a form (which I have to guess at, since you have provided *no* details), you can use the `keepvalues` option to not reset the fields of a form. On Tuesday, May 5, 2020 at 8:24:32 AM UTC-4, Anuj Mahawar wrote: > > Hey Scott, > Yeah, I meant that the date is resetting to the

[web2py] Re: web2py - date picker issue

Hey Scott, Yeah, I meant that the date is resetting to the current date even though I am selecting any previous date. Do you have any suggestions to change this default behavior? On Tuesday, May 5, 2020 at 5:22:30 PM UTC+5:30, Scott Hunter wrote: > > What do you mean by "redirected"? If you

[web2py] Re: web2py - date picker issue

What do you mean by "redirected"? If you just mean that the date field is reset to the current date, that is the same default behavior for all input fields. On Tuesday, May 5, 2020 at 12:44:31 AM UTC-4, Anuj Mahawar wrote: > > I am a beginner to the web2py. I am building an application with a

Re: [web2py] Re: web2py online debugger under python3

Hi Clemens I definitely can't help you with this problem. Sorry. But I am interested in why you use the online debugger and not something else? Thanks Andrew On Mon, 4 May 2020 at 23:50, Clemens wrote: > Hello Massimo, > > I hoped the latest web2py version would fix the problem. My current >

[web2py] Re: web2py online debugger under python3

Hello Massimo, I hoped the latest web2py version would fix the problem. My current configuration is now: web2py version 2.20.4-stable+timestamp.2020.05.03.05.18.50, Running on Rocket 1.2.6, Python 3.6.9, Ubuntu 18.04., Firefox 75.0 (64-bit) But the online debugger still doesn't work. The

Re: [web2py] Re: web2py and ubuntu 20lts

Noted guys Works well. regards On Friday, May 1, 2020 at 4:57:11 PM UTC+3, Lovedie JC wrote: > > On system restart, the previous pyc files for python 2+ were deleted and > it works OK. > Let me observe for now. > Regards > > On Fri, May 1, 2020, 11:26 Lovedie JC > > wrote: > >> Let me try >>

Re: [web2py] Re: web2py and ubuntu 20lts

On system restart, the previous pyc files for python 2+ were deleted and it works OK. Let me observe for now. Regards On Fri, May 1, 2020, 11:26 Lovedie JC wrote: > Let me try > > On Fri, May 1, 2020, 11:00 Clemens > wrote: > >> Hi Maurice, >> >> obviously you're trying to execute your

Re: [web2py] Re: web2py and ubuntu 20lts

Let me try On Fri, May 1, 2020, 11:00 Clemens wrote: > Hi Maurice, > > obviously you're trying to execute your pythone-2-compiled code with > python 3 (Ubuntu 20 default). Have a try recompiling it with python 3.x. > > Does this solve the problem? > > Regards > Clemens > > On Friday, May 1,

[web2py] Re: web2py and ubuntu 20lts

Hi Maurice, obviously you're trying to execute your pythone-2-compiled code with python 3 (Ubuntu 20 default). Have a try recompiling it with python 3.x. Does this solve the problem? Regards Clemens On Friday, May 1, 2020 at 7:24:34 AM UTC+2, Maurice Waka wrote: > > I recently moved to

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >