[web2py] Re: priority of web2py CMS

2012-04-17 Thread Gour
On Mon, 16 Apr 2012 04:50:39 -0700 (PDT) Ross Peoples wrote: > No, I've been tied up doing other (non-web2py) projects lately. I > hope to get back to being more active here in a couple of weeks. OK. Thank you for info. Sincerely, Gour -- When your intelligence has passed out of the dense fo

[web2py] Re: priority of web2py CMS

2012-04-16 Thread Ross Peoples
No, I've been tied up doing other (non-web2py) projects lately. I hope to get back to being more active here in a couple of weeks. On Sunday, April 15, 2012 2:54:45 AM UTC-4, Gour wrote: > > On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 12:41:32 -0800 (PST) > Ross Peoples > wrote: > > Hello Ross, > > > The good news is I

[web2py] Re: priority of web2py CMS

2012-04-14 Thread Gour
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 12:41:32 -0800 (PST) Ross Peoples wrote: Hello Ross, > The good news is I've already figured out how to do it, I just have to > put the work in. Have you done some work on your web2py-powered-CMS-ala-C5? Sincerely, Gour -- But those who, out of envy, disregard these teac

[web2py] Re: priority of web2py CMS

2012-01-16 Thread Massimo Di Pierro
One piece that every CMS needs and we could all benefit from is the following: a plugin to manage groups: - create groups - apply for membership - add memberships to owned(created) groups - approve members of owned(created) groups - revoke membership etc. I could use it right away. On Jan 16, 3:

[web2py] Re: priority of web2py CMS

2012-01-16 Thread Gour
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 12:41:32 -0800 (PST) Ross Peoples wrote: > Not yet. Just a bunch of proof of concept ideas. I have to combine > them into a workable solution, which will take some time. The good > news is I've already figured out how to do it, I just have to put the > work in. Good luck. ;)

[web2py] Re: priority of web2py CMS

2012-01-16 Thread Ross Peoples
Not yet. Just a bunch of proof of concept ideas. I have to combine them into a workable solution, which will take some time. The good news is I've already figured out how to do it, I just have to put the work in.

[web2py] Re: priority of web2py CMS

2012-01-16 Thread Gour
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 10:49:41 -0800 (PST) Ross Peoples wrote: > The goal with my CMS is that I could stick an executive in front of > it (someone who barely knows how to check their email), and allow > them to theme their site, lay it out they way they want, and add > content with a simple drag &

Re: [web2py] Re: priority of web2py CMS

2012-01-16 Thread Ross Peoples
I am also working on a CMS that will be a bit different than Movuca. The goal with my CMS is that I could stick an executive in front of it (someone who barely knows how to check their email), and allow them to theme their site, lay it out they way they want, and add content with a simple drag &

Re: [web2py] Re: priority of web2py CMS

2012-01-15 Thread Ovidio Marinho
I think Movuca can be the revolution. It may be all in one, Twitter, Facebook, Wordpress, gTalk, Blave. If each one has an idea of ​​how to integrate all in one would cut as many web pages open, it needs to performance tests to see if all the media protocols are supported at the same time.

Re: [web2py] Re: priority of web2py CMS

2012-01-15 Thread Bruno Rocha
content types are "posts" but you can customize the fields it has to store in db. and customize the new/edit/show views. you can also include specific methods for each content type you can specify how a content type will be listed and its privacy options. the idea is to have content types create

[web2py] Re: priority of web2py CMS

2012-01-15 Thread Gour
On Sun, 15 Jan 2012 10:47:31 -0200 Bruno Rocha wrote: > Movuca is a social network engine, but it is also a CMS. OK. > It is intended to be generic and customizable, you can create themes, > contenttypes etc... This sounds good. New contentypes are sort of plugins or something else? > If som