Re: [web2py] Re: web2py 2.14.1 is OUT

2016-04-27 Thread Richard Vézina
Can you open a issue here : https://github.com/mdipierro/web2py-book/issues/new On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 1:57 AM, Mirek Zvolský wrote: > AppConfig really need better description in the book. > > > > > > Dne pátek 25. března 2016 3:07:18 UTC+1 Massimo Di Pierro napsal(a): > >>

[web2py] Re: web2py 2.14.1 is OUT

2016-04-26 Thread Mirek Zvolský
AppConfig really need better description in the book. Dne pátek 25. března 2016 3:07:18 UTC+1 Massimo Di Pierro napsal(a): > > > > On Thursday, 24 March 2016 20:15:13 UTC-5, 黄祥 wrote: >> >> the new configuration surely is different from previous one, i have some >> question about it

[web2py] Re: web2py 2.14.1 is OUT

2016-03-28 Thread Dave S
On Monday, March 28, 2016 at 11:32:37 AM UTC-7, Dave S wrote: > > [...] > Running this test server also brought to my attention some asssumptions I > had made about server environment, and where I didn't really need > hard-coded paths, so I've got cleaner code now! > > Cleaner in the "more

[web2py] Re: web2py 2.14.1 is OUT

2016-03-28 Thread Dave S
On Friday, March 25, 2016 at 12:37:32 PM UTC-7, Dave S wrote: > > > On Friday, March 25, 2016 at 12:22:22 PM UTC-7, Anthony wrote: >> >> Do you have an __init__.py in /applications as well as /uploader? >> >> Anthony >> > > Ha! I just figured it out, and saw your message as I came back to report.

Re: [web2py] Re: web2py 2.14.1 is OUT

2016-03-26 Thread rahul13
Congratulations all for new web2py On Mar 26, 2016 1:07 AM, "Dave S" wrote: > > > On Friday, March 25, 2016 at 12:22:22 PM UTC-7, Anthony wrote: >> >> Do you have an __init__.py in /applications as well as /uploader? >> >> Anthony >> > > Ha! I just figured it out, and

[web2py] Re: web2py 2.14.1 is OUT

2016-03-25 Thread Dave S
On Friday, March 25, 2016 at 12:22:22 PM UTC-7, Anthony wrote: > > Do you have an __init__.py in /applications as well as /uploader? > > Anthony > Ha! I just figured it out, and saw your message as I came back to report. It was uploader/__init__.py that was missing. I had missed that when

[web2py] Re: web2py 2.14.1 is OUT

2016-03-25 Thread Anthony
Do you have an __init__.py in /applications as well as /uploader? Anthony On Friday, March 25, 2016 at 3:13:35 PM UTC-4, Dave S wrote: > > On Thursday, March 24, 2016 at 4:55:27 PM UTC-7, Dave S wrote: >> >> On Thursday, March 24, 2016 at 1:17:18 PM UTC-7, Dave S wrote: >>> >>> On Thursday,

[web2py] Re: web2py 2.14.1 is OUT

2016-03-25 Thread Dave S
On Thursday, March 24, 2016 at 4:55:27 PM UTC-7, Dave S wrote: > > On Thursday, March 24, 2016 at 1:17:18 PM UTC-7, Dave S wrote: >> >> On Thursday, March 24, 2016 at 12:41:50 PM UTC-7, Dave S wrote: >>> >>> On Thursday, March 24, 2016 at 10:36:54 AM UTC-7, Massimo Di Pierro >>> wrote:

[web2py] Re: web2py 2.14.1 is OUT

2016-03-25 Thread Ramkrishan Bhatt
Hi Massimo, Yeah its awesome change set i can see, specially for GAE support. very Thanks to Simone (niphlod), Richard, and Leonel for contribution. Very congrats to all :) . Now i am not using web2py much but always kept eyes on update in groups post and github logs. Congrats once again to

[web2py] Re: web2py 2.14.1 is OUT

2016-03-24 Thread 黄祥
not sure enough about the boolean configuration in appconfig. just tested it but return an error traceback, e.g. *appconfig.ini* [smtp] ssl= true *db.py* auth.settings.create_user_groups = myconf.get('smtp.ssl') *traceback error* TypeError: unsupported operand type(s) for %: 'bool' and

[web2py] Re: web2py 2.14.1 is OUT

2016-03-24 Thread 黄祥
target locked, the culprit is : *in old version :* response.form_label_separator = myconf.get('forms.separator') *in current version : * response.form_label_separator = myconf.get('forms.separator') or '' *effect :* when using old version conf in current version web2py, in form field the name is

[web2py] Re: web2py 2.14.1 is OUT

2016-03-24 Thread 黄祥
pictures means thousand words, in previous version 2.13.x the same code doesnt have None in every form field, i guess the root cause is in T() but not sure because I never Translate for Id yet the result is same IdNone (please see attached files), the expected is without None : Id thanks and

[web2py] Re: web2py 2.14.1 is OUT

2016-03-24 Thread Massimo Di Pierro
Do not understand can you explain more? On Thursday, 24 March 2016 20:27:56 UTC-5, 黄祥 wrote: > > i realize the sqlform(), sqlform.grid() and sqlform.factory() is behave > strangely, the form field is added with None, e.g. NameNone > is there a way to fix this? > > thanks and best regards, >

[web2py] Re: web2py 2.14.1 is OUT

2016-03-24 Thread Massimo Di Pierro
On Thursday, 24 March 2016 20:15:13 UTC-5, 黄祥 wrote: > > the new configuration surely is different from previous one, i have some > question about it (appconfig.ini and db.py) > 1. myconf.get() instead of myconf.take() is there any difference or the > old one is drop? > Not the same. take is

[web2py] Re: web2py 2.14.1 is OUT

2016-03-24 Thread 黄祥
i realize the sqlform(), sqlform.grid() and sqlform.factory() is behave strangely, the form field is added with None, e.g. NameNone is there a way to fix this? thanks and best regards, stifan -- Resources: - http://web2py.com - http://web2py.com/book (Documentation) -

[web2py] Re: web2py 2.14.1 is OUT

2016-03-24 Thread 黄祥
the new configuration surely is different from previous one, i have some question about it (appconfig.ini and db.py) 1. myconf.get() instead of myconf.take() is there any difference or the old one is drop? 2. pool_size = myconf.get('db.pool_size'), i learned from anthony in the old version it

[web2py] Re: web2py 2.14.1 is OUT

2016-03-24 Thread Dave S
On Thursday, March 24, 2016 at 1:17:18 PM UTC-7, Dave S wrote: > > > > On Thursday, March 24, 2016 at 12:41:50 PM UTC-7, Dave S wrote: >> >> >> >> On Thursday, March 24, 2016 at 10:36:54 AM UTC-7, Massimo Di Pierro wrote: >>> >>> http://web2py.com/ >>> >>> First of all many many thanks to Simone

Re: [web2py] Re: web2py 2.14.1 is OUT

2016-03-24 Thread Dave S
On Thursday, March 24, 2016 at 1:14:48 PM UTC-7, Dave S wrote: > > > > On Thursday, March 24, 2016 at 12:51:52 PM UTC-7, Richard wrote: >> >> Hello Dave, >> >> You may have a look in gluon/contrib... Simone had change scheduler since >> 2.13.1 and there is info about how to instantiate

[web2py] Re: web2py 2.14.1 is OUT

2016-03-24 Thread Niphlod
just to reassure that scheduler code has changed to fix a bug with prevent-drift: nothing has changed instantiation-wise (and the traceback points otherwise, well before scheduler istantiation...) On Thursday, March 24, 2016 at 9:17:18 PM UTC+1, Dave S wrote: > > > > On Thursday, March 24,

[web2py] Re: web2py 2.14.1 is OUT

2016-03-24 Thread Dave S
On Thursday, March 24, 2016 at 12:41:50 PM UTC-7, Dave S wrote: > > > > On Thursday, March 24, 2016 at 10:36:54 AM UTC-7, Massimo Di Pierro wrote: >> >> http://web2py.com/ >> >> First of all many many thanks to Simone (niphlod), Richard, and Leonel. >> Most of the work is theirs. >> >> > My

Re: [web2py] Re: web2py 2.14.1 is OUT

2016-03-24 Thread Dave S
On Thursday, March 24, 2016 at 12:51:52 PM UTC-7, Richard wrote: > > Hello Dave, > > You may have a look in gluon/contrib... Simone had change scheduler since > 2.13.1 and there is info about how to instantiate scheduler now in the > changelog... > Not it. I have things running on 2.13.4

Re: [web2py] Re: web2py 2.14.1 is OUT

2016-03-24 Thread Richard Vézina
Hello Dave, You may have a look in gluon/contrib... Simone had change scheduler since 2.13.1 and there is info about how to instantiate scheduler now in the changelog... On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 3:41 PM, Dave S wrote: > > > On Thursday, March 24, 2016 at 10:36:54 AM

[web2py] Re: web2py 2.14.1 is OUT

2016-03-24 Thread Dave S
On Thursday, March 24, 2016 at 10:36:54 AM UTC-7, Massimo Di Pierro wrote: > > http://web2py.com/ > > First of all many many thanks to Simone (niphlod), Richard, and Leonel. > Most of the work is theirs. > > My thanks also ... web2py has been a great resource for me. As with the beta, I'm